eprintid: 633
rev_number: 7
eprint_status: archive
userid: 607
dir: disk0/00/00/06/33
datestamp: 2019-02-04 06:14:27
lastmod: 2019-02-04 06:14:27
status_changed: 2019-02-04 06:14:27
type: article
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: Purnomo, Yoppy Wahyu
creators_name: Kaur, Amrita
creators_name: Ismail, Siti Noor Binti
creators_name: Suryadi, Didi
creators_name: Darwis, Sutawanir
creators_id: yoppy.w.purnomo@uhamka.ac.id
title: The consistency between professed teaching practices and assessment practices: A case in mathematics class
ispublished: pub
subjects: L1
divisions: sch_soc
keywords: Assessment practices, Teaching practices, Mathematics class, Scale development study, Cross-sectional Survey
abstract: The purpose of this research was to (1) develop scales for measuring teaching practices and assessment practices in mathematics class; (2) identify the profile of teaching practices and assessment practices in mathematics class; and (3) examine the consistency between relevant factors in teaching practices and assessment practices in mathematics class. The methods of cross-sectional surveys and a scale development study were used to achieve that purpose. The participants in this research included two sample groups of primary school teachers in Jakarta. The first sample consisted of 252 teachers and the second sample consisted of 325 teachers. This research found that there were two factors in each dimension of teachers’ practices in mathematics class. Teaching practices included the relational and instrumental practices, while the assessment practices included the assessment for learning and assessment of learning. This research also found that most of the teachers leaned toward traditional practices for both teaching practices and assessment practices, and that there was a consistency between relevant factors in those teaching and assessment practices. A more detailed discussion can be found in the findings and discussion section.
date: 2018-12
date_type: published
publisher: Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Mataram in collaboration with Asosiasi Dosen Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika PTKIN (Ad-Mapeta)
official_url: https://jurnalbeta.ac.id/index.php/betaJTM/article/view/223
full_text_status: public
publication: Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika
volume: 11
number: 2
pagerange: 101-113
refereed: TRUE
issn: 2085-5893
referencetext: Abdullah, A., Marzbali, M. H., Woolley, H., Bahauddin, A., & Tilaki, M. J. M. (2014). Territorial functioning and victimisation: Conceptualisation and scale development. Crime, Law and Social Change, 61(3), 335–354. Doi:10.1007/s10611-013-9490-6
Balan, A. (2010). Assessment for learning: A case study in mathematics education. Faculty of Education and Society. Malmö University, Holmbergs, Malmö. Retrieved from http://www.mah.se/muep
Barrett, P. (2007). Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 815–824. Doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.018
Berg, D. H. (2008). Working memory and arithmetic calculation in children: The contributory roles of processing speed, short-term memory, and reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 99, 288-308. Doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2007.12.002
Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Maidenhead, U.K.: Open University Press.
Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2004). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(1), 9–21. Retrieved from http://datause.cse.ucla.edu/DOCS/pb_wor_2004.pdf
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139–148. Doi:10.1002/hrm
Cherney, A., Povey, J., Head, B., Boreham, P., & Ferguson, M. (2012). What influences the utilisation of educational research by policy-makers and practitioners?: The perspectives of academic educational researchers. International Journal of Educational Research, 56, 23-34. Doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2012.08.001
Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Delandshere, G. (2002). Assessment as inquiry. Teachers College Record, 104(7), 1461–1484. Doi:10.1111/1467-9620.00210
Delandshere, G., & Jones, J. H. (1999). Elementary teachers’ beliefs about assessment in mathematics: A case of assessment paralysis. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 14(3), 216–240. Doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123.
Fabrigar, L. R., MacCallum, R. C., Wegener, D. T., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 7).
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
James, M., Black, P., Carmichael, P., Conner, C., Dudley, P., Fox, A., Marshall, B. (2006). Learning how to learn: tools for schools. New York: Routledge.
Kasih, P. A., & Purnomo, Y. W. (2016). Peningkatan hasil belajar matematika siswa sekolah dasar melalui pembelajaran perbasis penilaian. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, 1(1), 69–78.
Kaur, A., Noman, M., & Awang-Hashim, R. (2018). Exploring and evaluating differentiated assessment practices of in-service teachers for components of differentiation. Teaching Education, 6210, 1–17. Doi:10.1080/10476210.2018.1455084
Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Examining the technological pedagogical content knowledge of Singapore pre-service teachers with a large-scale survey. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(6), 563–573. Doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00372.x
Lysenko, L. V., Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Dagenais, C., & Janosz, M. (2014). Educational research in educational practice: Predictors of use. Canadian Journal of Education, 37(2), 1-26.
Ma, X., Millman, R., & Wells, M. (2008). Infusing assessment into mathematics content courses for pre-service elementary school teachers. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 7(3), 165–181. Doi:10.1007/s10671-008-9050-5
Mansyur, M. (2011). Pengembangan model assessment for learning pada pembelajaran matematika di SMP. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 15(1), 71–91.
Maulana, R., Opdenakker, M.-C., den Brok, P., & Bosker, R. J. (2012). Teacher-student interpersonal behavior in secondary mathematics classes in Indonesia. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(1), 21–47. Doi:10.1007/s10763-011-9276-1
Pituch, K. A., & Stevens, J. P. (2016). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (Sixth Edition). London, United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis Ltd.
Purnomo, Y. W. (2013). Keefektifan penilaian formatif terhadap hasil belajar matematika mahasiswa ditinjau dari motivsi belajar. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika (pp. 649–656). Yogyakarta: FPMIPA, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Purnomo, Y. W. (2014). Assessment-based learning: Sebuah tinjauan untuk meningkatkan motivasi belajar dan pemahaman matematis. Sigma, VI(01), 22–33.
Purnomo, Y. W. (2015). Pengembangan desain pembelajaran berbasis penilaian dalam pembelajaran matematika. Cakrawala Pendidikan, XXXIV(2), 182–191. Doi:10.21831/cp.v2i2.4823
Purnomo, Y. W. (2016a). Eksplorasi keyakinan guru tentang matematika, belajar dan mengajar, penilaian dan hubungannya dengan praktik di kelas matematika. (Unpublished master thesis). Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Purnomo, Y. W. (2016b). Perbaikan instruksional dalam implementasi assessment-based learning di kelas matematika. Cakrawala Pendidikan, XXXV(3), 403–411. Doi:10.21831/cp.v35i3.8821
Purnomo, Y. W. (2017a). A scale for measuring teachers’ mathematics-related beliefs: A validity and reliability study. International Journal of Instruction, 10(2), 23–38. Doi:10.12973/iji.2017.1022a
Purnomo, Y. W. (2017b). The complex relationship between teachers’ mathematics-related beliefs and their practices in mathematics class. The New Educational Review, 47(1), 200–210. Doi:10.15804/tner.2017.47.1.16
Purnomo, Y. W., Suryadi, D., & Darwis, S. (2016). Examining pre-service elementary school teacher beliefs and instructional practices in mathematics class. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 8(4), 629–642.
Setiani, F. (2011). Pengembangan asesmen alternatif dalam pembelajaran matematika dengan pendekatan realistik di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 15(2), 250–268. Doi:10.21831/pep.v15i2.1096
Shute, V. J. (2007). Focus on formative feedback. ETS research report series. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Suci, V. W., & Purnomo, Y. W. (2016). Hubungan antara konsepsi penilaian dan kecemasan siswa sekolah dasar di kelas matematika. Βeta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 9(1), 48–60.
Swan, M. (2006). Designing and using research instruments to describe the beliefs and practices of mathematics teachers. Research in Education. Doi:10.7227/RIE.75.5
Wijaya, A., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Doorman, M. (2015). Teachers’ teaching practices and beliefs regarding context-based tasks and their relation with students’ difficulties in solving these tasks. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 27(4), 637–662. Doi:10.1007/s13394-015-0157-8
funders: Kementerian Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi Republik Indonesia
citation:   Purnomo, Yoppy Wahyu dan Kaur, Amrita dan Ismail, Siti Noor Binti dan Suryadi, Didi dan Darwis, Sutawanir  (2018) The consistency between professed teaching practices and assessment practices: A case in mathematics class.  Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 11 (2).  pp. 101-113.  ISSN 2085-5893     
document_url: http://repository.uhamka.ac.id/id/eprint/633/1/BETA2018.pdf