eprintid: 46177
rev_number: 7
eprint_status: archive
userid: 1831
dir: disk0/00/04/61/77
datestamp: 2025-08-01 03:22:05
lastmod: 2025-08-01 03:22:05
status_changed: 2025-08-01 03:22:05
type: article
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: Romadlan, Said
creators_name: Maududi, Mukhlish Muhammad
creators_name: Wahdiyati, Dini
creators_name: Putra, Gilang Kumari
creators_id: saidromadlan@uhamka.ac.id
creators_id: maoedoedi@uhamka.ac.id
creators_id: diniwahdiyati@uhamka.ac.id
creators_id: Gilang.kumari@uhamka.ac.id
corp_creators: Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. HAMKA
corp_creators: Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. HAMKA
corp_creators: Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. HAMKA
corp_creators: Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. HAMKA
title: Diskursus Pemberitaan Media Online mengenai Penerimaan Izin Usaha Pertambangan oleh Muhammadiyah dan Nahdlatul Ulama
ispublished: pub
subjects: H
divisions: 70201
abstract: As an Islamic community organization, Muhammadiyah and Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) have received an offer for a mining business license from the Government. This acceptance raises pros and cons from various circles. The controversy over the receipt of mining business licenses by Muhammadiyah and NU then became a discourse in the online media, where there was a discourse of pros and cons over the receipt of the mining
permit. This study aims to show the discourse of online media news regarding the receipt of mining business licenses by Muhammadiyah and NU. For this reason, the method used is
the discourse analysis of the Halliday-Hasan model which focuses its analysis on three elements, namely (1) tenor of discourse, (2) field of discourse, and (3) mode of discourse. The results of the study show that there are
two areas of discourse that appear in the online media, namely approving (pro) and rejecting (con) the receipt of mining business licenses by Muhammadiyah and NU. For the
tenor of discourse in the field of discourse who agree are dominated by sources from Muhammadiyah leaders, NU leaders, and members of the House of Representatives. Meanwhile, the tenor of the discourse who refused came from Muhammadiyah internal circles, non-governmental organization activists, academics/experts, and members of the House of Representatives. The mode of discourse used by online media are descriptive, argumentative, and persuasive writing styles. The results of this study strengthen the influence of media routines on the practice of media discourse.
date: 2025-07-31
date_type: published
publisher: Communications Science Study Program Universitas Negeri Jakarta.
official_url: https://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/communications/article/view/53721/20706
id_number: https://doi.org/10.21009.coms7.2.3
full_text_status: public
publication: Communications
volume: 7
number: 2
pagerange: 171-193
refereed: TRUE
issn: 2684-8392
citation:   Romadlan, Said dan Maududi, Mukhlish Muhammad dan Wahdiyati, Dini dan Putra, Gilang Kumari  (2025) Diskursus Pemberitaan Media Online mengenai Penerimaan Izin Usaha Pertambangan oleh Muhammadiyah dan Nahdlatul Ulama.  Communications, 7 (2).  pp. 171-193.  ISSN 2684-8392     
document_url: http://repository.uhamka.ac.id/id/eprint/46177/1/artikel%20jurnal%20communications%20UNJ-izin%20tambang-published.pdf