eprintid: 442 rev_number: 7 eprint_status: archive userid: 5 dir: disk0/00/00/04/42 datestamp: 2018-03-27 08:56:26 lastmod: 2018-03-27 08:56:26 status_changed: 2018-03-27 08:56:26 type: article metadata_visibility: show creators_name: Muchdie, Muchdie creators_name: M. Kusmawan, Kusmawan creators_id: eidmuchdie@uhamka.ac.id corp_creators: Department of Management, Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. DR. HAMKA, Jakarta, Indonesia corp_creators: Department of Management, STIE Ahmad Dahlan, Jakarta, Indonesia title: SECTOR-SPECIFIC AND SPATIAL-SPECIFIC MULTIPLIERS IN THE USA ECONOMY: WORLD INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS ispublished: pub subjects: HB subjects: HC abstract: This article calculates, presents and discusses on sectoral and spatial multipliers in the USA economy using 6-country-30 sector input-output tables for the year 2000, 2005, 2010 and 2014. The results revealed that firstly, all sectors with total output multipliers more than 2; flow-on effect was more than initial effect. In the USA economy, there were 19 sectors in the year of 2000, 18 sectors in 2005, 2010 and 2014, with total output multipliers more than 2. Secondly, total output multipliers had negative correlation with percentage of multipliers that occurred in own-sector. The higher total output multipliers, the smaller percentage of multipliers occurred in own-sector. All initial effects occurred in own-sector. Parts of direct effects occurred in own-sector and parts occurred in other-sectors. All indirect effect occurred in other-sector. Thirdly, total output multipliers had negative correlation with percentage of multipliers that occurred in own-country. The higher total output multipliers, the smaller percentage of multipliers occurred in own-country. All initial and direct effects occurred in own-country. Parts of indirect effects occurred in other-countries. date: 2018 publisher: Scientific & Academic Publishing official_url: http://article.sapub.org/10.5923.j.economics.20180802.03.html full_text_status: public publication: American Journal of Economics volume: 8 number: 2 pagerange: 83-92 refereed: TRUE issn: 2166-4951 referencetext: [1] Ahiakpor, J.C.W. (2000), “Hawtrey on the Keynesian Multiplier: A Question of Cognitive Dissonance?”, History of Political Economy, 32 (4): 889-908. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/13245/pdf. [2] Beemiller, R.M. (1990), “Improving Accuracy by Combining Primary Data with RIMS: Comment on Bourque”, International Regional Science Review, 13 (1-2):99-101. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/016001769001300107. [3] Burda, W., (2005), Macroeconomics: A European Text, Fourth Edition, Oxford University Press. http://www.naturligtraw.com/macroeconomics-a-european-text.pdf. [4] Coughlin, C. and Mandelbaum, T.B. (1991), “A Consumer's Guide to Regional Economic Multipliers”, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, January/February 1991:19-32. https://0x9.me/kGHZM. [5] DiPasquale, D. and Polenske, K.R. (1980), “Output, Income and Employment Input-Output Multipliers” in S. Pleeter (Ed), Economic Impact Analysis: Methodology and Applications, Studies in Applied Regional Science, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishing: 85-113. [6] Dornbusch, R. and Stanley, F. (1994), Macroeconomics, Sixth Edition, International Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill. [7] Grady, P. and Muller, R., A. (1988), “On the use and misuse of input-output based impact analysis in evaluation”, The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 2 (3): 49-61. https://0x9.me/ufxVS. [8] Hall, R. E. (2009), “By How Much Does GDP Rise if the Government Buys More Output?”, NBER Working Paper 15496, National Bureau of Economic Research. www.nber.org/papers/w15496.pdf?new_window=1. [9] Harris, P. (1997), “Limitations on the use of regional economic impact multipliers by practitioners: An application to the tourism industry”, The Journal of Tourism Studies, 8(2): 1-12. https://0x9.me/Ke5hU. [10] Hughes, D. W. (2003), “Policy uses of economic multipliers and impact analysis”, Choices Publication of the American Agricultural Economics Association, Second Quarter. http://www.choicesmagazine.org/2003-2/2003-2-06.htm. [11] Isard, W. (1951), “Inter-regional and Regional Input-Output Analysis: A Model of a Space-Economy”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 33(4): 318-328. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1926459 13. [12] Jensen, R.C., Mandeville, T.D., and Karunaratne, N.D., (1979), Regional Economic Planning: Generation of Regional Input-Output Analysis, Croom Helm, and London. http://bookorder.ru/Regional-economic-planning--generation-of-regional-input -output-analysis--or--cR-C-Jensen-T-D-Mandev/5/faiadhdc. [13] Kahn, R. (1931), “The Relation of Home Investment to Unemployment”, Economic Journal, 41(162):173-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2223697. [14] Krugman, P., and Wells, R. (2009), Economics, Worth Publisher, p: 1200, Chapter 14: Money, Banking, and the Federal Reserve System: Reserves, Bank Deposits, and the Money Multiplier: 393–396. https://0x9.me/PGmBS. [15] Leontief, W.W. (1951), The Structure of American Economy 1919-1939, Second Edition, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. http://www.wleontief.ru/eng/40.html. [16] Mankiw, N.G. (2008), Macroeconomics, Eight Edition, South-Western Publishing, Part VI: Money and Prices in the Long Run: The Money Multiplier: 347–349. https://www.academia.edu/15354353/Mankiw_macroeconomics_8th_edition. [17] McConnell, C, Brue, S, and Flynn, S. (2011), Macroeconomics, 19th Edition, McGraw-Hill Series Economics, ISBN-13: 978-0077337728, ISBN-10: 0077337727. [18] Mills, E. C. (1993), “The Misuse of Regional Economic Models”, Cato Journal, 13(1): 29-39. https://ideas.repec.org/a/cto/journl/v13y1993i1p29-39.html. [19] Miller, R.E. and Blair, P.D. (1985), Input-output analysis: Foundations and extensions, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc, http://www.usp.br/nereus/wp-content/uploads/MB-2009-05-Ch-2-Found-I-O-Anal.pdf. [20] Moore, F.T, and Petersen, J. (1955). “Regional Analysis: An Inter-Industry Model of Utah”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 37: 368-383. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1925851?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents. [21] Oosterhaven, J and Stelder, D., (2007), Regional and Interregional IO Analysis, Faculty of Economics and Business University of Groningen, the Netherlands, https://www.rug.nl/research/reg/research/irios/download/regional-io-analysis.pdf. [22] Pindyck, R. and Rubinfeld, D. (2012), Macroeconomics, 8th Edition, The Pearson Series in Economics, ISBN13: 978-0132857123. [23] Richardson, H.W. (1985). “Input-Output and Economic Base Multipliers: Looking Backward and Forward”, Journal of Regional Science, 25 (4): 607-661. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9787.1985.tb00325.x/abstract. [24] Siegfried, J, Allen R., Sanderson, A.R., and McHenry, P. (2006), “The Economic Impact of Colleges and Universities”, Working Paper No. 06-W12. http://www.accessecon.com/pubs/VUECON/vu06-w12.pdf. [25] Tiebout, C.M. (1956), “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures”, The Journal of Political Economy, 64(5): 416424. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1826343 27. [26] Timmer, M. P., Los, B., Stehrer, R. and de Vries, G. J., (2016), "An Anatomy of the Global Trade Slowdown based on the WIOD 2016 Release", GGDC Research Memorandum No. 162, University of Groningen, http://www.ggdc.net/publications/memorandum/gd162.pdf. [27] Timmer, M.P., Dietzenbacher, E., Los, B., Stehrer, R., and de Vries, G.J., (2015), “An Illustrated User Guide to the World Input–Output Database: the Case of Global Automotive Production”, Review of International Economics, 23(3): 575–605, ISSN: 1467-9396, DOI:10.1111/roie.1217, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/roie.12178/full. [28] West, G.R., (1990), "Regional Trade Estimation: A Hybrid Approach", International Regional Science Review, 13 (1&2): 103-118, ISSN: 0160-0176, http://journals.sagepub.com /doi/abs/10.1177/016001769001300108. citation: Muchdie, Muchdie dan M. Kusmawan, Kusmawan (2018) SECTOR-SPECIFIC AND SPATIAL-SPECIFIC MULTIPLIERS IN THE USA ECONOMY: WORLD INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS. American Journal of Economics, 8 (2). pp. 83-92. ISSN 2166-4951 document_url: http://repository.uhamka.ac.id/id/eprint/442/1/10.5923.j.economics.20180802.03.pdf