eprintid: 40687
rev_number: 7
eprint_status: archive
userid: 1568
dir: disk0/00/04/06/87
datestamp: 2025-01-07 01:29:53
lastmod: 2025-01-07 01:29:53
status_changed: 2025-01-07 01:29:53
type: article
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: muntazhimah, muntazhimah
creators_name: Efendi, Hidir
creators_name: Syae Purrohman, Purnama
creators_name: Slamet Soro, SS
creators_name: Soebagyo, Joko
creators_name: Purwanto, Sigid Edy
creators_name: Umam, Khoerul
creators_id: muntazhimah@uhamka.ac.id
creators_id: purnamasae@uhamka.ac.id
creators_id: joko_soebagyo@uhamka.ac.id
creators_id: sigid@uhamka.ac.id
creators_orcid: 0000-0003-2469-9461
creators_orcid: 0000-0002-9233-1557
creators_orcid: 0000-0002-1629-4643
creators_orcid: 0000-0002-1432-1564
creators_orcid: 0000-0002-9233-1557
title: Difference in results: High school students’ mathematical reflective thinking of science and social studies
ispublished: pub
subjects: L
divisions: sch_med
abstract: A growing body of literature has showed that mathematical reflective thinking ability plays a crucial role in the learning process. Nevertheless, students’ mathematical reflective thinking ability are not always in a good condition. Therefor The overarching objective of this qualitative study sought to explore the mathematical reflective thinking abilities of senior high school students in the science and social studies specialization program. A total of ten senior high school students in west java participated in the study. The data collecting used were observation, tests, and interviews. Triangulation strategy used to develop a comprehensive understanding of phenomena. The results showed that senior high school on science program were unable to fulfil all the indicators in each phase of reflective thinking. The phase that was mastered by students is the reacting phase, the phase that is sufficiently mastered by students is the elaborating/comparing phase, while the contemplating phase for students is still diverse. conversely the average subject on social program were only mastered the comparing phase where the subject could explain the answers obtained and could relate the problems asked to the problems they had faced. Furthermore, the reacting and contemplating phases were still not optimal because there were still subjects who did not write down and state what was asked and known and did not make final conclusions correctly.
official_url: https://pubs.aip.org/
full_text_status: public
publication: AIP Publishing
refereed: FALSE
citation:   muntazhimah, muntazhimah dan Efendi, Hidir dan Syae Purrohman, Purnama dan Slamet Soro, SS dan Soebagyo, Joko dan Purwanto, Sigid Edy dan Umam, Khoerul   Difference in results: High school students’ mathematical reflective thinking of science and social studies.  AIP Publishing.       
document_url: http://repository.uhamka.ac.id/id/eprint/40687/1/cover.pdf