eprintid: 16941
rev_number: 8
eprint_status: archive
userid: 1868
dir: disk0/00/01/69/41
datestamp: 2022-09-15 06:03:21
lastmod: 2022-09-15 06:03:21
status_changed: 2022-09-15 06:03:21
type: thesis
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: Abu Bakar Fahmi, Fahmi
creators_name: Bagus Takwin, Aten
title: Kelas Sosial dan Penilaian Keadilan Prosedural
ispublished: unpub
subjects: BF
divisions: 16
abstract: Penelitian terbaru mengungkapkan bahwa persepsi orang terhadap kelas sosialnya di masyarakat mempengaruhi berbagai aspek kehidupan, termasuk kognisi sosial. Dalam penelitian ini, kami menguji hipotesis bahwa persepsi orang terhadap kelas sosialnya mempengaruhi penilaian atas keadilan prosedural di mana orang yang berada pada tingkat kelas sosial atas lebih peka penilaian keadilan proseduralnya berkenaan dengan prosedur pengambilan keputusan baik adil maupun tidak adil; dan orang yang berada pada tingkat kelas sosial bawah lebih peka penilaian keadilan proseduralnya saat orang lain mendapat prosedur pengambilan keputusan yang tidak adil. Kami melakukan dua studi dengan memanipulasi kelas sosial subjektif relatif partisipan dan meminta mereka membayangkan berada dalam kondisi adil atau tidak adil baik untuk diri sendiri (studi 1) maupun orang lain (studi 2). Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa manipulasi kelas sosial subjektif tidak berpengaruh secara signifikan terhadap penilaian keadilan prosedural.Dibandingpartisipan yang berada dalam kondisi kelas sosial bawah, partisipan yang berada dalam kondisi kelas sosial atas tidak menunjukkan kepekaan yang lebih besar dalam penilaian keadilan prosedural baik saat berada pada prosedur voice maupun no-voice (Studi 1).Dibandingpartisipan yang berada dalam kondisi kelas sosial atas, partisipan yang berada dalam kondisi kelas sosial bawah tidak menunjukkan kepekaan yang lebih besar saat berada pada prosedur tidak akurat (Studi 2).
date: 2014
date_type: completed
full_text_status: public
pages: 20
institution: Universitas Indonesia
department: Psikologi
thesis_type: masters
thesis_name: other
referencetext: Adler, N. E., Epel, E. S., Castellazzo, G., & Ickovics, J. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social class with psychological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy White women. Health Psychology, 19, 586-592.
Blader, S. L., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). A four-component model of procedural justice: Defining the meaning of a “fair” process. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 747-758.
Cote, S. (2011). How social class shapes thoughts and actions in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior.
Fiske, S. T. (2010). Interpersonal stratification: Status, power, and subordination. Dalam S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert & G. Lindzey (Eds.) Handbook of Social Psychology, Volume 1. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Folger, R. (1977). Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of “voice” and improvement on experienced inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 108-119.
Grossmann, I & Huynh, A. C. (2013). Where is the culture in social class? Psychological Inquiry, 24(2), 112-119. 
Kitayama, S., Duffy, S., & Uchida, Y. (2007). Self as cultural mode of being.Dalam S. Kitayama & D. Cohen (Ed.).Handbook of Cultural Psychology. New York: The Guilford Press. 
Kraus, M. W., & Keltner, D. (2009). Signs of socioeconomic status: A thin-slicing approach. Psychological Science, 20, 99-106.
Kraus, M. W., & Keltner, D. (2013).Social class rank, essentialism, and punitive judgment.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/a0032895.
Kraus, M. W., Côté, S., & Keltner, D. (2010). Social class, contextualism, and empathic accuracy.Psychological Science, 21, 1716-1723.
Kraus, M. W., Piff, P. K., & Keltner, D. (2009).Social class, sense of control, and social explanation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 992-1004.
Kraus, M. W., Piff, P. K., & Keltner, D. (2011). Social class as culture: The convergence of resources and rank in the social realm. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 246-250. 
Kraus, M. W., Piff, P. K., Mendoza-Denton, R., Rheinschmidt, M. L., & Keltner, D. (2012). Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: How the rich are different from the poor. Psychological Review, 119, 546-572.
Kraus, M. W., Tan, J. J. X., & Tannenbaum, M. T. (2013). The social ladder: A rank-based perspective on social class. Psychological Inquiry. 24 (2), 81-96.
Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approach to the study of fairness in social relationships.Dalam K. Gergen, M. Greenberg, & R. Willis (Eds.).Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research. New York: Plenum. 
Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988).The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum.
Lind, E. A., Kanfer, R., & Earley, P. C. (1990). Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 952-959.
Oakes, J. M., & Rossi, R. H. (2003). The measurement of SES in health research: Current practice and steps toward a new approach. Social Science and Medicine, 56, 769-784.
Piff, P. K. (2014). Wealth and the inflated self: Class, entitlement, and narcissism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40 (1), 34-43.
Piff, P. K., Stancato, D. M., Côté, S., Mendoza-Denton, R., & Keltner, D. (2012). Higher social  class predicts increased unethical behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 4086-4091.
Sedikides, C., Hart, C.M., & De Cremer, D. (2008).The self in procedural fairness.Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2/6, 2107-2124.
Stellar, J. E., Manzo, V. M. Kraus, M.W., & Keltner, D. (2011). Class and compassion: Socioeconomic factors predict responses to suffering. DOI: 10.1037/a0026508.
Stephens, N. M., & Townsend, S. S. M. (2013).Rank is not enough: Why we need a sociocultural perspective to understand social class. Psychological Inquiry, 24, 126-130.
Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1978).A theory of procedure.California Law Review, 66 (3), 541-566.
Triandis, H.C., & Gelfand, M.J. (2012).A Theory of Individualism and Collectivism.Dalam P.A.M. Van Lange, A.W. Kruglanski, & E.T. Higgins (Eds).Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology Volume 2. Los Angeles: Sage.
Tyler, T. R. (2012). Justice Theory. Dalam P.A.M. Van Lange, A.W. Kruglanski, & E.T. Higgins (Eds).Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology Volume 2. Los Angeles: Sage.  
Tyler. T. R., Boeckmann, R. J., Smith, H. J., & Hou, Y. J. (1997). Social Justice in A Diverse Society. Colorado: Westview Press.
Van den Bos, K. (1999). What are we talking about when we talk about no-voice procedures? On the psychology of the fair outcome effect.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 560-577.
Van den Bos, K., & Van Prooijen, J.-W. (2001). Referent cognitions theory: The psychology of voice depends on closeness of reference points. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 616-626.
Van Prooijen, J.-W.(2013). Individualistic and social motives for justice judgments.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1299, 60-67.
Van Prooijen, J.-W., De Cremer, D., Van Beest, I.,  Stahl, T., van Dijke, M., & van Lange, P.A.M. (2008). The egocentric nature of procedural justice: social value orientation as moderator of reactions to decision-making procedures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1303-1315.
Van Prooijen, J.-W., Stahl, T., Eek, D., & Van Lange, P.A.M. (2012). Injustice for all or just for me? Social value orientation predicts responses to own versus other’s procedures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(10), 1247-1258.
Van Prooijen, J.-W., Van den Bos, K., & Wilke, H. A. M. (2002). Procedural justice and status: Status salience as antecedent of procedural fairness effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1353-1361.
Vermunt, R., Wit, A., Van den Bos, K., & Lind, E. A. (1996). The effects of unfair procedure on negative affect and protest. Social Justice Research, 9 (2), 109-119.
citation:   Abu Bakar Fahmi, Fahmi dan Bagus Takwin, Aten  (2014) Kelas Sosial dan Penilaian Keadilan Prosedural.  Masters thesis, Universitas Indonesia.   
document_url: http://repository.uhamka.ac.id/id/eprint/16941/1/Abu%20Bakar%20Fahmi-Tesis-FPsi-Naskah%20Ringkas-2014.pdf