eprintid: 16459
rev_number: 8
eprint_status: archive
userid: 3861
dir: disk0/00/01/64/59
datestamp: 2022-08-16 12:01:49
lastmod: 2022-08-16 12:01:49
status_changed: 2022-08-16 12:01:49
type: thesis
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: Mardiana, Yana
title: An Analysis of Three Teachers’ Scafollding Talks and
Students’s Responses to them in EFL Classrooms
ispublished: pub
subjects: C
divisions: 88103
keywords: Teachers’ scaffolding talks (classroom discourse), the zone of Proximal development (second language acquisition), EFL classroom.
abstract: In language learning, teachers surely have essential roles in facilitating and providing students with meaningful experiences and interactions through communication during teaching and learning process in EFL classrooms. To help students achieve their very best capability in language learning, teachers can use scaffolding talks with Zone of Proximal Development during all the classroom activities. This study is a mix-method study on teachers’ scaffolding talks in classroom interaction to find out the types of teachers’ scaffolding talks, the reason why they applied those types, and the students’ response toward their teachers’ scaffolding talks in EFL classrooms. This study has some subjects which are three English teachers at SMK Negeri 06 Konawe Selatan who teach the tenth grade up to the twelfth grade and 70 students who divided into three classes. The data of this research were collected from three ways: (1) observation of spoken interaction in classroom context between teachers and students that were recorded twice for each teacher, so there are six recordings of teachers’ talks, (2) the interview with these three teachers, and (3) the questionnaire from the students. The data were analyzed qualitatively and also quantitatively to find the types of scaffolding talks employed and the reason why they applied those types, and the students’ response toward their teachers’ scaffolding talks in EFL classrooms. The observation and interview data about the types of scaffolding talks were analyzed based on Afda Walqui, Wood, etc., for instance, modeling, giving clear direction, explaining, inviting students’ participation, questioning, clarifying students’ understanding, developing students’ understanding, reinforcing, and reviewing. The interview data about the reasons of the use of these scaffolding talk types were analyzed by theme analysis, and the data of questionnaire to know the students’ response toward their teachers’ scaffolding talks was analyzed by usingSPSS. The first result shows that the teachers employ scaffolding talks in the teaching-learning such as modeling, giving direction, explaining, inviting students’ participation, questioning, clarifying and developing students’ understanding, reinforcing, and reviewing. The second result states that they are some reasons of the using of those types of teachers’ scaffolding talks; they are helping students to study faster, motivating students to be more active, stimulating students’ thinking, and getting comprehension about lesson easier. The third result shows that students have positive response and perception toward their teachers’ scaffolding talks in EFL classrooms. Based on the result above, there are some suggestions in this study. First, teachers should maximize the quality of their talks during teaching and learning process in EFL classrooms which means they should improve and develop their ability in choosing the types of scaffolding talk appropriately according to situation and condition that can help students in reaching their maximal potency in language learning. Second, it is recommended for other researchers to elaborate on the issue of this study which is talking about teachers' scaffolding talks. Hopefully, the next researches do not only discuss the types of teachers' scaffolding talks and students' responses toward them but also discuss a more in-depth and broader issue related this scaffolding talks which can provide us more critical and many various information of scaffolding talks in EFL classrooms.
date: 2018-11-27
date_type: completed
full_text_status: public
institution: Universitas Muhammadiyah Prod. Dr. HAMKA
department: Sekolah Pascasarjana UHAMKA
thesis_type: masters
thesis_name: other
referencetext: REFERENCES
Agustien, H. I. R. 2002. Teacher‟s Scaffolding talks: A resource for Shaping
Classroom Discourse. Forum on English Language Study. Sanatha Dharma
University 2002.
Allport, GW. 1996. Pattern and Growth in Personality. London: William Clowes and
Sons, Ltd.
Anderson, Mark and Kathy. 1997. Text type in English. 1. Malaysia: Macmillan
Education Australia PTY LTD.
Attarzadeh, Mohammad. 2011. The effect of scaffolding on reading comprehension
of various text modes on Iranian EFL learners with different proficiency
levels. Iran. Social Sciences and Humanities- MESOJ- ISSN 2109-9618- N°4-
Volume 2 ( 2011)
Austin ZA, Sutton J. 2014. Qualitative research: getting started. Can J Hosp
Pharm. .[PMC free article] [PubMed]
Berg, B. L. 2007. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. London:
Pearson.
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative
Research in Psychology, 3 (2). pp. 77-101. ISSN 1478-0887 Available from:
http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/11735
Cameron, Lyne. 2001. Teaching Language to Young Learners. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Celce-Murcia- Murcia et al. 1995. Communicative Competence: A Pedagogically
Motivated Model with Content Specification. Paper. Regents of the University
of California.
Creswell, J. W. 2003. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods
approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003).
Advanced mixed methods research designs. Handbook of mixed methods in
social and behavioral research, 209-240.
Corden, Roy. 2000. Literacy and Learning Through Talk: Strategic to The Primary
Classroom. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Coulthard, Malcolm. 1975. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis.
England:Longman.
Dickson, S. V., Chard, D. J., & Simmons, D. C. 1993. An integrated reading/writing
curriculum: a focus on scaffolding. LD Forum, 18(4)
Dulay, et al. 1982. Language Two. New York: Oxford University Press,
Eggin, Suzzane. 1994. An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London:
Printer Publisher Ltd.
Galguera, Thomas. 2003. Scaffolding for English Learners: What’s a Science Teacher
do? http://lhsfossorg/newsletter/archieve/foss21.Scaffolding.html-40k.
Gibbon, Pauline. 2002. Scaffolding Language, Scaffolding Learning: Teaching
Second Language Learners in the Mainstream Classroom. USA: Heinemann.
Hinds, P. S., Vogel, R. J., Clarke-Steffen, L. 1997. The possibilities and pitfalls of
doing a secondary analysis of a qualitative data set. Qualitative Health
Research, 7, 408–424. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI
Kayi-Aydar, Hayrire. 2013. Scaffolding Language Learning in Academic ESL
Classroom. Published by Oxford University Press; ELT Journal Volume 67/3
July 2013;
Maybin J, Mercer N & Stierer B. 1992. „Scaffolding‟ learning in the classroom.
London: Hodder & Stoughton
Mercer N. 1994. In Language, Literacy and Learning in Educational Practice. Ed.
Stierer B & Maybin J. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 2002. Phenomenology of Perception. New York: Routledge
Milne, John. 1999. Questionnaires: Advantages and Disadvantages, Centre for CBL
in Land Use and Environmental Sciences, Aberdeen University, Retrieved
[November,20th 2010] from http://www.icbl.hw.ac.uk/ltdi/cookbook/info
_questionnaires/
Noviana, Aulia .2016. The Students’ Perception toward Teacher Talk in English
Class (The Study of The Eleventh Graders of SMAN 7 Banjarmasin Academic
Year 2015/2016). Skripsi, Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan.
Patton, M.Q. 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, 2nd Ed. Newbury
Park, CA: Sage.
Riazi, M. & Rezaii, M. 2011. Teacher- and peer-scaffolding behaviors: Effects on
EFL students’ writing improvement. In A. Feryok (Ed.), CLESOL 2010:
Proceedings of the 12th National Conference for Community Languages and
ESOL (pp. 55-63). Retrieved from http://www.tesolanz.org.nz/
Richards, J, J Platt and H. Platt. 1992. Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching
and Applied Linguistics. Great Britain:Longman.
Roehler, R., Laura and Cantlon, J., Danise. (no date). Scaffolding a Power Tool in
Social Constructivist Classrooms. http://ed.web3.educ.msu.
Edu/literacy/papers/paer/r.z.htm-99k.
Samana, Warithorn. 2013. Teacher’s and Students’ Scaffolding in an EFL Classroom.
Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies. MCSER Publishing, Rome-
Italy, Vol 2 No 8
Sofeny. Daniar, and Irmayani. 2017. Students’ Perceptions Towards Teacher Talk In
English Classrooms. Seminar Nasional Sistem Informasi 2017, 14 September
2017 Fakultas Teknologi Informasi – UNMER Malang Copyright ©
SENASIF 2017 ISSN : 2597 – 4696 223
Sugiyono. Prof. Dr. 2013. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D.
Bandung: CV Alfabeta.
Sumardiyani, L and Sakhiyya, Z. 2007. Speaking for Instructional Purpose: a
Handbook. Semarang: IKIP PGRI Press
Surtiati. 2008. Teacher’s Scaffolding talkss in English Class at Senior High School.
English studies of Graduate Program, Sate University of Semarang.
Stuyf, R. Vandr, Rachel. 2002. Scaffolding as Teaching Strategy.
http://tip.psychology.org/vygotsky.html.
Turney, C. et al. 1976. Sidney Micro Skills Redeveloped. Series 1 Handbook:
Reinforcement, Basic Questioning, Variability. Australia: Griffin Press
Limited
_____ C. et al. 1983. Sidney Micro Skills Redeveloped. Series 2
Handbook:Explaining, Introductory, Procedure and Closure, Advanced
Questioning. Australia: Griffin Press Limited
Walsh, Steven. 2002. Construction or obstruction: teacher talk and learner
involvement in the EFL classroom. Language Teaching Research, vol. 6, no.
1,
Willis, J. 1992. Inner and Outer: Spoken Discourse in the Language Classroom In
Coulthard, M (ed.). Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis. London:
Routledge.
Wilkinson, C., and Silliman, R., Elaine. 2000. Classroom Language and Literacy
Learning. http://Readingonline. Org/articles/handbook.
Winarti. 2017. Classrrom Interaction: teacher and Student Talk in International Class
Program (ICP). LSCAC Conference Proceedings The 4th International
Conference on Language, Society and Culture in Asian Contexts (2016),
Volume 2017.
citation:   Mardiana, Yana  (2018) An Analysis of Three Teachers’ Scafollding Talks and Students’s Responses to them in EFL Classrooms.  Masters thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Prod. Dr. HAMKA.   
document_url: http://repository.uhamka.ac.id/id/eprint/16459/1/SPS_INGGRIS_1609067022_YANA%20MARDIANA.pdf