eprintid: 16262
rev_number: 7
eprint_status: archive
userid: 3861
dir: disk0/00/01/62/62
datestamp: 2022-08-05 03:37:55
lastmod: 2022-08-05 03:37:55
status_changed: 2022-08-05 03:37:55
type: thesis
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: Parulian, Erwin Victor
title: Developing Reading Skill of EFL Learners Through Metacognition
ispublished: pub
subjects: C
divisions: 88103
keywords: Reading skill, reading comprehension, cognitive process, metacognition
abstract: Reading is not simply a cognitive process; however, it takes metacognition to help the learners in order that the learners gain comprehension of the written text. The current study tried to explore how the learners of vocational high school developed their reading comprehension using metacognition. The finding was that the learners acknowledged that metacognition supported the development of reading comprehension of the learners. Metacognition enabled the learners to gain self-awareness about their lacks, focused on those lacks and regulated their learning in order to gain comprehension of the written text. The result showed that the learners were optimistic and motivated in developing their reading comprehension; however, the test result was not satisfactory. The reading performance of the learners were low. The current study suggested that future research investigate the correlation among self-awareness, motivation and reading performance of the learner.
date: 2018-08-27
date_type: completed
full_text_status: public
institution: Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof Dr. HAMKA
department: Sekolah Pascasarjana
thesis_type: masters
thesis_name: other
referencetext: REFERENCES Alhojailan, Mohammed Ibrahim.Thematic (2012). Analysis: A Critical Review of Its Process and Evaluation. West East Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 1 No. 1, p. 39-45.
Ahmadi, M. R., Ismail, H. N. & Abdullah, M. K. K. (2013). The Importance of Metacognitive Reading Strategy Awareness in Reading Comprehension. English Language Teaching, Vol. 6, No. 10. Canadian Center of Science and Education.
Ahmadi, M. & Sarani, A. (2013). A Study of Vocational and Non-Vocational High School Learner‟s Language Proficiency and Motivation. Advances in Asian Social Science (AAS), Vol. 4, No. 3.
Alverman, D. E. (1982). Metacognitive Knowledge About Reading Proficiency: Its Relation to Study Strategies and Task Demands. Journal of Reading Behaviour, Vol. XIV, No. 3, pp. 232.
Baker, L. & Brown, A. L. (1980). Metacognitive Skills and Reading. Massachusetts: Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc.
Baker, L. & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive Skills and Reading. Handbook of Reading Research, Vol. 1, pp. 353. Bassey, M. (1998). Action Research for Improving Practice. In R. Halsall. (Ed.). Teacher Research & School Improvement: Opening Doors from the Inside, (93). Buckingham: Open University Press. Borkowski, J., Carr, M., & Pressely, M. (1987). "Spontaneous" strategy use: Perspectives from metacognitive theory. Intelligence, 11, 61-75.
Bormotova, L. S. (2010). A Qualitative Study of Metacognitive Reflection: The Beliefs, Attitudes and Reflective Practices of Developing Professional Educators. Indiana University of Penssylvania.
Burton, S. W. (2017). Expert Elementary Readers: A Profile of Reading Proficiency. University of Tennessee. Doctoral Dissertation.
Brown, A. L. (1980). Theoritical Issues in Reading Comprehension: Perspective from Cognitive Psychology, Linguistics, Artificial Intelligence and Education. Metacognitive Development and Reading. New Jeersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children‟s Reading Comprehension Ability: Concurent Prediction by Working Memory, Verbal Ability, and Component Skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 96, No. 1, 31-42
Cantrell, S. C., Almasi, J. F., Carter, J. C., Rintamaa, M. & Madden, A. (2010). The Impact of a Strategy-Based Intervention on The Comprehension and Strategy Use of Struggling Adolescent Readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 102, No. 2, pp. 257-280.
Carson, L.J. (2012). An Exploration of Metacognition and Its interplay with other Forms of conscious Thought Processing in Independent Learning at Tertiary Level. Dublin city University.
Cockcroft, R. (2014). Enhancing Reading Comprehension through Metacognitive Instruction for English Second Language (ESL) Learners in the FET Band. Stellenbosch University.
Dar Wei Chen. (2015). Metacognitive Prompts and the Paper vs. Screen Debate: How Both Factors Influence Reading Behavior. Georgia Institute of Technology.
Ditzel, S. N. (2010). Metacognitive Reading Strategies Can Improve Self-Regulation. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 40(2).
Donna, L-F-P., T. Garry Waller. (1984). Cognition, Metacognition and Reading. NewYork: Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
Dunlosky, J., Hacker, D. J. & Graesser, A. C. (2009). Handbook of Metacognition in Education. New York: routledge.
Ertmer, P. A. & Newby, T. J. (1996). The Expert Learner: Strategic, Self-Regulated and Reflective. Instructional Science 24: I-24.
Eyre, R. N., Alter, A. L., Oppenheimer, D. M. & Epley, N. (2007). Overcoming Intuition: Metacognitive Difficulty Activates Analytic Reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 136, No. 4, pp. 569-576.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring. A New Era of Cognitive-Developmental Inquiry. American Psychologist, Vol. 34, No. 10, pp. 906-911.
Gardner, R.C. & Tremblay, P.F. (1994). On Motivation, Research Agendas, and Theoretical Frameworks. The Modern Language Journal, 78
Graham, S. (2006). A Study of Student‟s Metacognitive Beliefs About Foreign Language Study and Their Impact on Learning. University of Reading.
Hammond, L-D., Austin, K., Orcutt S. & Rosso, J. (2001). How People Learn: Introduction to Learning Theories. Standford University School of Education.
Hubbard, R. S. & Power, B. M. (1999). Living the questions: A guide for teacher- researchers. Portland, Maine: Stenhouse Publishers.
Hunt, D. P. (2003). The Concept of Knowledge and How to Measure It. Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 4, No.1, pp. 100.
Jeng-Jia Lou (Luo). (2010). EFL University Student‟s Reading of Academic English Text: Three Cases of Metacognition in Taiwan. Ohio State University Kasbollah, K.E.S. & Sukarnyana, W.I. (1988). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Malang: Penerbit Universitas Negeri Malang. Kemmis, S. & McTaggart, R. (1992). The Action Research Planner. Victoria: Deaken University Press.
Klaczynski, P. A. (2000). Motivated scientific reasoning biases, epistemological beliefs, and theory polarization: A two-process approach to adolescent cognition. Child Development, 71(5), 1347–1366.
Kolic-Vehovec, S & Bajsanski, I. (2006). Metacognitive Strategies and Reading Comprehension in Elementary-School Students. European Journal of Psychology of Education, Vol. XXI, p. 439-451. Koshy, V. (2005). Action Research for Improving Practice: A Practical Guide. Great Britain: TJ International Ltd.
Kuhn, D., Katz, J. B. & Dean Jr, D. (2004). Developing Reason. Thinking and Reasoning 10(2), pp. 197-219.
Lai, R. (2011). Metacognition: A Literature Review. Research Report. Pearson.
Lixia Pai. (2014). Does Metacognitive Strategy Instruction Indeed Improve Chinesse EFL Learner‟s Reading Comprehension Performance and Metacognitive Awareness. Journal of language Teaching and Research, Vol. 5, No. 5, pp. 1147-1152.
Louca, E. P. (2003). The Concept and Instruction of Metacognition. Teacher Development, Vol. 7, No. 1.
Louca, E. P. (2008). Metacognition and Theory of Mind. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholar Publishing, pp. 1-2 McNamara, D. S. (2009). The Importance of Teaching Reading Strategies. Perspective on Language and Literacy, p. 34. Mehta, P. D., Foorman, B. R., Branum-Martin, L., & Taylor, W. P. (2005). Literacy as a unidimensional construct: Validation, sources of influence and implications in a longitudinal study in grades 1–4. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(2), pp. 85–116. Metcalfe, J. (2008). Evolution of Metacognition. Handbook of Metamemory and Memory.New York: Psychology Press, pp. 43
Metcalfe, J. & Serra, M. J. (2009). Effective Implementation of Metacognition in Handbook of Metacognition in Education. New York: routledge.
Mijuskovic, M. & Simovic, S. (2015). The 21st Century English Language Reading Classroom in Montenegro: the Influence of Metacognitive Strategies on University Students‟ Attitudes Regarding the Process of Reading in English. Porta Linguarum 26, junio 2016. University of Montenegro.
Mirjam, H. (2005). Metacognitive Knowledge, Metacognitive Strategies, and CALL. Open University, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom.
Mokhtari, K. & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing Student‟s Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol, 94, No. 2, pp. 249-259.
Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Sainsbury, M. (2016). PIRLS Reading Purposes and Processes of Reading Comprehension.
Https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/pirls2011/downloads/PIRLS2011_Framework-Chapter2.pdf
Murat, B. & Mehmet, G. (2017). Effect of The SQ4R on The Reading Comprehension of 4th Grade Elementry School. International Journal of Instruction, Vol.10, No.2.
Muray, S. & Moore, K. (2012). Inclusion through Multiple Intelligences. Journal of Student Engagement:Education Matter, Article 8, Vol. 2, Issue 1, pp. 43. University of Wollonggong Australia.
Nae-Dong Yang. (1999). The Relationship Between EFL Learner‟s Beliefs and Learning Strategy Use. System No. 27, p. 515-535 National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and itsimplications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
Paris, S. G., & Winograd, P. W. (1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In Lai, E. R. (2011). Metacognition: Literature Review. Research Report. Pearson.
Paris, S. G. & Winograd, P. (2001). The Role of Self-Regulated Learning in Contextual Teaching: Principles and Practices for Teacher Preparation. CIERA Archive. #01-03. Phillips, D.A. & Carr, K. (2010). Becoming A Teacher through Action Research. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Pinninti, L. R. (2016). Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies: An Indian Context. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 179-193. Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The Role of Metacognitive Knowledge in Learning, Teaching and Assessing. Theory into Practice, 41, p. 219-225.
Samuel Kewaza & Myrtle I. Welch. (2013). Big Class Size Challenges: Teaching Reading in Primary Classes in Kampala, Uganda‟s Central Municipality. US-China Education Review A, Vol.3, No.5, p. 283-296.
Schoonen, R., Hulstjin, J., Bossers, B. (1998). Metacognitive and Language Specific Knowledge in Native and Foreign Language Reading Comprehesion: An Empirical Study Among Dutch Students in Grade 6, 8 and 10. Language Learning 48:1, pp. 71-106.
Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting Metacognitive Awareness. Instructional Science 26, pp. 113-125.
Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. In Lai, E. R. (2011). Metacognition: Literature Review. Research Report. Pearson.
Schwarz, N. (2008). Meaning in Context: Metacognitive Experience. University of Michigan.
Shannon, S. V. (2008). Using Metacognitive Strategies and Learning Styles to Create Self-Directed Learners. Institute for Learning Style Journal, Vol. 1, 2008.
Shuyun Li, Hugh Munby. (1996). Metacognitive Strategies in Second Language Academic Reading: A Qualitative Investigation. English for Specific Purposes, Vol. 15, Issue 3, p. 199-216
Smith, S. (2004). Understanding Reading. A Psycholinguistic Analysis of Reading and Learning to Read. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Spence, D. J., Yore, L. D. & Williams, R. L. (1995). Explicit Science Reading Instruction in Grade 7: Metacognitive Awareness, Metacognitive Self-Management and Science Reading comprehension. San Fransisco: National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual Meeting.
Sveby, Karl-Eric. (2001). A Knowledge-Based Theory of The Firm to Guide in Strategy Formulation. Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 2 No. 4, p.344-358.
Thiede, K. W., Griffin, T. D., Wiley, J., Redford, J. S. (2009). Metacognitive Monitoring During and After Reading in Handbook of Metacognition in Education. New York: routledge.
Tobias, S. & Everson, H. T. (2009). The Importance of What You Know. A Knowledge Monitoring Framework for Studying Metacogntion in Education In Handbook of Metacognition in Education. New York: routledge.
Vandergrift, L. & Goh, C. C. M. (2012). Teaching and Learning Second Language Listening. Metacognition in Action. New York: Routledge.
Veenman, M. V. J. Hesselink, R. D., Sleeuwagen, S., Liem,S. I. E., & Van Haaren, M. G. P. (2014). Assessing Developmental Differences in Metacognitive Skills With Computer Logfiles: Gender by Age Interactions. Psychological Topics 23 (2014), 1, 99-113.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between Learning and Develoment. In Gauvain & Cole (Eds). Reading on The Development of Children. New York: Scientific American Books. pp. 34-40. Wenden, A. L. (1987). Metacognition an expanded view on the cognitive abilities of L2 learners. Language Learning 37 573-596 Wenden, A. L. (1998). Metacognitive and Language Learning. Applied Linguistics, 19/4 pp. 515-537.
Wright, J. M. (2015). Enhancing Reading Comprehension through Metacognitive Instruction for English Second Language (ESL) Learners in the FET Band. Doctoral Dissertations.
Young, A. & Fry, D. (2008). Metacognitive Awareness and Academic Achievement in college Students. Journal of The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 2).
Zimmermen, B. J. (2002). Becoming A Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory into Practice, Vol. 41, No. 2. College of Education, The Ohio State University.
citation:   Parulian, Erwin Victor  (2018) Developing Reading Skill of EFL Learners Through Metacognition.  Masters thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof Dr. HAMKA.   
document_url: http://repository.uhamka.ac.id/id/eprint/16262/1/SPS_INGGRIS_1408066018_ERWIN%20VICTOR%20PARULIAN.pdf