eprintid: 14393
rev_number: 11
eprint_status: archive
userid: 2342
dir: disk0/00/01/43/93
datestamp: 2022-06-02 08:38:11
lastmod: 2022-06-29 07:47:29
status_changed: 2022-06-02 08:38:11
type: thesis
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: Zakiyah, Fininda Rahma
creators_name: Warni, Silih
creators_name: Hartati, Neti
title: Students' Perceptions Toward Teacher's Written Corrective Feedback
ispublished: pub
subjects: L
subjects: Skripsi
divisions: 88203
abstract: Understanding the students' perceptions of the teacher's written corrective feedback is important in learning writing. The objectives of this research are; (1) to find out the types of written corrective feedback that is given by the teacher to the students' writings, and (2) to find out the perceptions given by students of teacher's written corrective feedback.
This research is a descriptive qualitative analysis. The data source was taken from the XII MIPA 3 of SMAN 9 Tangerang in 2019/2020. The data collecting procedures were the document analysis, questionnaire, and interview. The researcher used document analysis to identify types of written corrective feedback based on the theory of Rod Ellis. Then, to determine the students' perceptions of the students' written corrective feedback, the researcher distributed an open-ended questionnaire and interviewed the students. The findings showed that four types of written corrective feedback applied by the teacher. The teacher mostly applied direct corrective feedback. The questionnaire result showed that the teacher's written feedback is; (1) comprehensible, (2) not clear enough, (3) assisting, (4) encouraging, and (5) proportional. The interview result showed that students' positive responses and students' negative responses to the teacher's written corrective feedback.
date: 2020
date_type: completed
full_text_status: public
institution: Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka
department: Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan
thesis_type: bachelor
thesis_name: bphil
referencetext: Amara, T. M. (2015). Learners’ perceptions of teacher written feedback commentary in an esl writing classroom. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 3(2), 38–53.
Anggraini, D. (2018). Students’ perspective toward teacher’s written corrective feedback on students’ writing in paragraph writing class.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C., & Razavieh, A. (2010). Introduction to research in education 8th edition.
Berzesenyi, C. A. (2001). Comments to comments: teachers and students in written dialogue about critical revision. Retrieved from http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3986/15_200110/ai_n_896744
Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2008). The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teaching Research, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168808089924
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles an interactive approach to language pendagody 2nd edition. Longman.
Chiang, K. (2004). An investigation into students’ preferences for and responses to teacher feedback and its implications for writing teachers. Hong Kong Teachers’ Centre Journal, 3, 98–115.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: planning, conducting and evaluating. quantitative and qualitative research fourth edition. Pearson.
Ellis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, 63(2), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn023
Ellis, R. (2010). A framework forinvestigating oral and written corrective feedback. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 335–349. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990544
Evans, N. W., Hartshorn, K. J., & Allen Tuioti, E. (2010). Written Corrective Feedback: The Practitioners’ Perspective. International Journal of English Studies, 10(2), 47. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2010/2/119191
Ferris, D. (2006). “Does error feedback help student writers? new evidence on the short and long-term effects of written error corrections” In K. Hyland & F. Hyland, Feedback in second language writing: contexts and issues. Cambridge Applied Linguistic.
Ferris, D., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), 161–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00039-X
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. Mc Graw Hill.
Gebhard, J. G. (1996). Teaching english as a foreign or second language. The University of Michigan Press.
Harmer, J. (2004). How to teach writing. Pearson Longman.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Contexts and issues in feedback on L2 writing : An introduction. Research Gate, 1–22.
Lalande, J. F. (1982). Reducing Composition Errors: An Experiment. The Modern Language Journal, 66(2), 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1982.tb06973.x
Lewis, M. (2002). Giving feedback in language classes. The University of Auckland : SEAMO Regional Language Centre.
Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2006). How languages are learned. Oxford University Press.
Listiani. (2017). Students’ perception toward teacher ’s written corrective feedback in writing 3 class. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), 109(Aecon), 164–167.
Liu, J., & Hansen, J. G. (2005). Guiding principles for effective peer feedback. ELT Journal, (59), 31–38.
Mahfoodh, O. H. A. (2017). “I feel disappointed”: efl university students’ emotional responses towards teacher written feedback. Assessing Writing, 31, 53–72.
Meyers, A. (2005). Gateways to academic writing: effective sentences, paragraph, and essays. Longman.
Mory, E. H. (2004). Feedback research revisited. Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 745–783.
Oates, L. C. (2000). Beyond communication: writing as a means of learning. The Journal of the Legal Writing Institute, 1.
Oshima, A., & Hogue, A. (2007). Introduction to academic writing third edition. Pearson Longman.
Penaflorida, A. (2002). Nontraditional forms of assesment and responses to student writing: a step torward learner autonomy. in J.C. Richards & W.A. Renandy (eds). In Methodology in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Raimes, A. (1983). Techniques in teaching writing. New York: Oxford University Press.
Richards, J. C. (1990). The language teaching matrix. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in language teaching: an anthology of currect practice. Cambridge University Press.
Robb, T., Ross, S., & Shortreed, I. (1986). Salience of Feedback on Error and Its Effect on EFL Writing Quality. TESOL Quarterly, 20(1), 83. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586390
Rodgers, H. (2005). Writing systems: a linguistic approach. Blackwell Publishing.
Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on esl learners’ acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), 48–61.
Truscott, J. (1996). Review article the case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning Article, 46(2), 327–369.
Vasu, K., Ling, C. H., & Nimehchisalem, V. (2016). Malaysian tertiary level ESL students’ perceptions toward teacher feedback, peer feedback and self-assessment in their writing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 5(5), 158–170. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.5p.158
Williams, J. G. (2003). Providing feedback on esl students’ written assignments. TESL Journal, IX(10).
citation:   Zakiyah, Fininda Rahma dan Warni, Silih dan Hartati, Neti  (2020) Students' Perceptions Toward Teacher's Written Corrective Feedback.  Bachelor thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka.   
document_url: http://repository.uhamka.ac.id/id/eprint/14393/1/FKIP_PBI_1501055043_FININDA%20RAHMA%20ZAKIYAH.pdf