eprintid: 14390
rev_number: 11
eprint_status: archive
userid: 2342
dir: disk0/00/01/43/90
datestamp: 2022-06-02 08:38:04
lastmod: 2022-07-02 04:28:49
status_changed: 2022-06-02 08:38:04
type: thesis
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: Umam, Mohammad Iqdam Amrul
creators_name: Zuhad, Ahmad
creators_name: Komara, Cahya
creators_id: zuhad.ahmad@uhamka.ac.id
creators_id: cahya.komara@uhamka.ac.id
creators_orcid: 0000-0001-7994-8440
title: An Analysis of Students Difficulties in Writing Recount Text at the Eighth Grade of MTS Sirajul Falah Bogor on Second Semester of 2019/2020 Academic Year
ispublished: pub
subjects: L
subjects: Skripsi
divisions: 88203
abstract: This research analyzed and examined students‟ difficulties in writing recount text at the eighth grade of MTS Sirajul Falah Bogor on second semester of 2019/2020 academic year. The objective of this research is to get factual data of what factors that make eighth grade students of MTS Sirajul Falah Bogor get difficulties in in writing recount text. Besides, this research also tried to figure out the quality of eighth grade students of MTS Sirajul Falah Bogor in writing recount text (either good or bad). Therefore, this research involved 20 students as sample of research by selecting 8.III class with purposed sampling technique. There instruments were used to get data, which were observation form, test of writing recount text, and interview. The data was analyzed by using qualitative method analysis. The results showed that that eighth grade students of MTS Sirajul Falah Bogor got difficulties because of language features lack of understanding factor. It was found that most students got difficulties on language features, which were grammar problem of past tense or 12 students or 60% and poor of vocabularies or 12 students or 60%. This result was different with generic structure analysis scoring which were 12 students or 60% passed the stage than 8 students or 40% who failed to complete stage. Therefore, the language features of grammar (past tense) and vocabulary became the 20 students‟ main difficulties. Next, the result of total scoring of generic structure and language features analysis also found 11 students or 55% majority of 20 students got low score or bad compared with only 9 students or 45% who passed the Standard Minimum Scoring (65). Thus, the majority of students‟ recount text result was not good. These results were supported from the result of interview that showed majority of students responded they had poor of vocabulary and grammar problem which means they got problem most in language features.
date: 2020
date_type: completed
full_text_status: public
institution: Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka
department: Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan
thesis_type: bachelor
thesis_name: bphil
referencetext: Anker, S. (2010). Real writing. Boston: Bedford/St. Martins.
Brown, H. D. (2000). Teaching by Principles. London: Longman.
Burns, Anne., Siegel, J. (2018). International Perspectives on Teaching the Four Skills in ELT. In International Perspectives on Teaching the Four Skills in ELT.
Christie, F., & Derewianka, B. (2008). School discourse. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Creswell, J. W. (n.d.). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Fareed, M., Ashraf, A., & Bilal, M. (2016). ESL Learners‟ Writing Skills: Problems, Factors and Suggestions. Journal of Education & Social Sciences, 4(2), 83–94.
Folse, K., Vokoun, A. M., & Solomon, E. . (2010). Great Paragraphs. Boston: Heinle Cengage Learning.
Gerot, L., & Wignell, P. (1994). Making sense of functional grammar. Sydney: Gerd Stabler Antipodean Educational Enterprises.
Görlach, M. (2004). Text types and the history of scots. In Journal of English Linguistics (Vol. 25).
Grenville, K. (2001). Writing from Start to Finish: A Six-Step Guide. In Writing.
Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English. New York: Longman, Pearson.
Harmer, J. (2004). How to Teach Writing. New York: Pearson.
Hikmah, K. (2014). An analysis of students‟ problem in writing recount text to the first grade of man kebumen 1 in 2013/2014 academic year. Undergraduate thesis, Muhammadiyah University of Purworejo.
Hinkel, E. (2006). Current perspectives on teaching the four skills. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 109–131.
Husna, A., & Multazim, A. (2019). Students‟ Difficulties in Writing Recount Text At Inclusion Classes. LET: Linguistics, Literature and English Teaching Journal, 9(1), 52–76.
Hyland, K. (2004). Genre and second language writing. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
Knapp, P., & Watskin, M. (2005). Genre, text, grammar. Australia: University of New South Wales Press Ltd.
Langan, C. M. (2002). The art of knowing. New York: Mega Press.
National School Curriculum. (2013). Ministry of Education, Indonesia.
Pratiwi, K. D. (2015). Students ‟ Difficulties in Writing English ( A Study at The Third Semester Students of English Education Program At University of Bengkulu Academic Year 2011-2012 ) Kr E Journal Universitas Bengkulu, 1(1964), 1–13.
Seyabi, F. A. L., & Tuzlukova, V. (2015). Investigating EFL reading problems and strategies in post-basic schools and university foundation programmes: a study in the Omani context. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research, 11(2), 35–51.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Yulianawati, I. (2018). An analysis of students' difficulties in writing recount text (a case study at a senior high school in indramayu). JURNAL EDUCATIVE: English focus journal, 2(1), 39–50.
citation:   Umam, Mohammad Iqdam Amrul dan Zuhad, Ahmad dan Komara, Cahya  (2020) An Analysis of Students Difficulties in Writing Recount Text at the Eighth Grade of MTS Sirajul Falah Bogor on Second Semester of 2019/2020 Academic Year.  Bachelor thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka.   
document_url: http://repository.uhamka.ac.id/id/eprint/14390/1/FKIP_PBI_1301065101_MOHAMMAD%20IQDAM%20AMRUL%20UMAM.pdf