eprintid: 14368
rev_number: 11
eprint_status: archive
userid: 2342
dir: disk0/00/01/43/68
datestamp: 2022-06-02 08:37:16
lastmod: 2022-06-28 09:04:12
status_changed: 2022-06-02 08:37:16
type: thesis
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: Rahman, Fathur
creators_name: Hasibuan, Bahrul
creators_name: KANIADEWI, NITA
creators_id: nitakaniadewi@uhamka.ac.id
creators_orcid: 0000-0002-9233-1557
title: An Error Analysis of Descriptive Writing of the Eleventh Grade Students of SMKN 20 Jakarta in the 2017/2018 Academic Year
ispublished: pub
subjects: L
subjects: Skripsi
divisions: 88203
abstract: This research was held at SMKN 20 Jakarta. The objective of the study is to find the empirical evidence of the most common types and sources of error that the eleventh grade students of SMKN 20 Jakarta made in their descriptive writing in the 2017/2018 academic year. The samples of this study were 21 students of XI PB class. The writer used error analysis and descriptive analysis as methods of research. He found that the top three typical errors that the students made were punctuation with 44 or 22.3% errors, word choice with 25 or 12.7% errors, and add a word with 21 or 10.7% errors. The down three typical errors that the students
made were meaning not clear with 3 or 1.5% errors, verb tense with 2 or 1% errors, and article with 1 or 0.5% errors. Meanwhile, the highest source of the students’
error was intralingua errors with 187 or 89.1% errors and the lowest source of the students’ error was interlanguage errors with 7 or 10.9% errors. It can be concluded that the teacher needs to give more explanation about the terms of punctuation, word choice, and add a word to the students. It is proven that the top three types of error are punctuation, word choice, and add a word. Moreover, the benefits of the research result are to give the information about the types and sources of error that the eleventh grade students of SMKN 20 Jakarta made and to give appropriate remedial teaching in order to reduce the students’ errors in punctuation, word choice, and add a word.
date: 2020
date_type: completed
full_text_status: public
institution: Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka
department: Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan
thesis_type: bachelor
thesis_name: bphil
referencetext: Azar, Betty Schrampfer. 1989. Understanding and Using English Grammar. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Brown, H. Douglas. 1994. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching Third Edition. New York: A Pearson Education Company.
Corder, S.P. 1981. Error Analysis and Interlanguage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crystal, David. 2008. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics Sixth Edition. New York: Basil Blackwell, Inc.
Febriana Surya Dewi. 2020. An analysis of Students Errors in Writing Descriptive Text at Tenth Grade of SMAN 1 Tulungagung in Academic Year 2018/2019. https://jurnal.stkippgritulungagung.ac.id/index.php/bright/article/view/1544/0
Eliot, Norbert., et al., 1990. A Program Development Handbook for the Holistic Assesment of Writing. London: Blackwell Publishing.
Ellis, Rod. 1997. Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fawcett, Susan and Alvin Sandberg. 1984. Evergreen: A Guide to Writing. Houghton: Mifflin Company.
Fisiak, Jacek. 1981. Contrastive Linguistics and the Language Teacher. New York: Pergamon Press.
Harmer, Jeremy. 2001. The Practice of English Language Teaching. New York: A Pearson Education Company.
Hubbard, Peter., et al. 1983. A Training Course for TEFL. New York: Oxford University Press.
James, Carl. 1998. Error in Language Learning and Use. New York: Longman.
Kane, Thomas S. 2000. Essential Guide to Writing. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.
Langan, John. 2010. Exploring Writing Sentences and Paragraphs Second Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Meyers, Alan. 2005. Gateways To Academic Writing. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.
Murcia, Marianne Celce and Elite Olshtain. 2000. Discourse and Context in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oshima, Alice and Ann Hogue. 2006. Writing Academic English Fourth Edition. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.
Puguh. 2011. Descriptive text. Retrieved on May 19th 2016, from https://pakpuguh.wordpress.com/2011/08/12/description-text/
Richards, Jack C and Willy Renandya. 2002. Methodology in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sumarsono, Sigit. 2013. Metode Riset Pendidikan Bahasa. Jakarta: UHAMKA Press.
Tarigan, Henry Guntur dan Djago Tarigan. 1990. Pengajaran Analisis Kesalahan Berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.
Ur, Penny. 1996. A Course in Language Teaching: Practice and Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wishon, George E and Julie M. Burks. 1986. Let’s Write English Revised Edition. New York: Atlantis Publisher Inc.
Yule,George. 2010. The Study of Language Fourth Edition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
citation:   Rahman, Fathur dan Hasibuan, Bahrul dan KANIADEWI, NITA  (2020) An Error Analysis of Descriptive Writing of the Eleventh Grade Students of SMKN 20 Jakarta in the 2017/2018 Academic Year.  Bachelor thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka.   
document_url: http://repository.uhamka.ac.id/id/eprint/14368/1/FKIP_PBI_1301065063_FATHUR%20RAHMAN.pdf