eprintid: 14365
rev_number: 11
eprint_status: archive
userid: 2342
dir: disk0/00/01/43/65
datestamp: 2022-06-02 08:37:10
lastmod: 2022-06-28 09:02:36
status_changed: 2022-06-02 08:37:10
type: thesis
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: Asmia, Devtika Ola
creators_name: Siswana, Siswana
creators_name: Zuhad, Ahmad
creators_id: siswana@gmail.com
creators_id: zuhad.ahmad@uhamka.ac.id
title: An Error Analysis on Descriptive Writing Made By The Tenth Grade Students’ of SMA Muhammadiyah 18 Jakarta in the Second Semester of 2019/2020 Academic Year
ispublished: pub
subjects: L
subjects: Skripsi
divisions: 88203
abstract: The research was held at SMA Muhammadiyah 18 Jakarta. The objectives of the study were: to know the types error on the students’ descriptive writing, to know the sources of the error, and to design the remedial teaching that are appropriate in order to reduce the students’ errors made by the tenth grade students of SMA Muhammadiyah 18 Jakarta in second semester of the 2019/ 2020 Academic Year in their descriptive writing. The samples respondent of this study were 25 students at X A. The writer asked the students to make the descriptive writing based on the instruction given on the writing task. The writer used Azar’s theory in analyzing the types of errors and Brown’s theory for the sources of errors in analyzing the data. Based on the calculating the results, the most types of errors that students made were the 42 additional word errors (16,86%) refering to the first place, and the second are 40 word choice and omitted word errors (16,06%). The most sources of error 134 interlingual transfer (53,81%) refering to the first place, and 115 intralingual transfer (46,18%) as the second place. The result of the data analysis showed that the most types of error and sources of error were additional word and for the sources of error was on interlingual transfer. It indicates that most students need more explanation and more doing exercise to evaluate their writing errors in English.
date: 2020
date_type: completed
full_text_status: public
institution: Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka
department: Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan
thesis_type: bachelor
thesis_name: bphil
referencetext: Anon, n.d. Syllabus SMA Muhammadiyah 18 Jakarta
Azar, Betty Schrampfer. 1992. Fundamental of English Grammar. New York: Prentice Hall. p. A6-A7.
Brown, H. Douglas. 2000. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. pp. 224-227
Boardman, Cintya A. Boardman. 2002. Writing to Communication. New York: Person Education. Inc. p.4
Crystal, David. 1992. an Encyclopedic Dictionary of Language and Languages. (UK:Blackwell). P.125.
Doddy, Achmad and Ahmad Sugeng Effendi. 2008. Developing English Competencies. Jakarta: Setia Purna Invest. p. 117
Ellis, Rod. 2007. The Study of Second Language Acquisition. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 48
2005. Analyzing Learner Language. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 56
2003. Second Language Acquisition. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 17
1997. Second Language Acquisition. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 17
Jacek Fisiak. 1985. Contrastive Linguistic and Language Teacher. New York:Pergamon Press. p.222
1981. Contrastive Linguistic and the Language Teacher. (Oxford:Pergamon Press). p. 221-222
Op. Cit. p. 244.
Gass, Susan M and Larry, Selinker. 2001. Second Language Acquisition: an introductory Courses, Second Edition. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates’, Inc. p.456.
Harmer, Jeremy. 2002. The Practice of English Language Teaching. Cambridge: Longman, p. 99.
2001. The Practice of English Teaching. Third Edition. London: Longman. p. 258.
Op. Cit. p. 100
Homby, A. S. 2000. Oxford Advances Learner’s Dictionary Six Edition. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 445.
Hubbard, Peter. 1983. a Training Course for TEFL. (Oxford: University Press). p. 134.
Hyland, Key. 2003. Second Language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 20
Kane, S. Thomas. 2003. The Oxford Essential Guide to Writing. New York: Oxford University press. p. 351
2000. Essential Guide to Writing. New York: Oxford University Press Inc, p. 6
Kristono, Andayani, E.T., Ismokoco & Tupan, A.F.J. 2007. The Bridge English Competence. Jakarta: Yudhistira.
Langan, John. 2003. College Writing Skills, Media Edition 5th Edition. New York: The McGraw –Hill Companies. P. 167
2001. College Writing Skills and Reading. New York: The Mc. Graw –Hill Companies. P. 23
Meyers, Alan. 2005. Gateways to Academic Writing; Effective Sentence, Paragraphs, and Essays. New York: Pearson Education, Inc. p.2.
Nunan, David, 1989. Designing Task for the Communication Classroom. New York: Cambridge, p. 36
Oshima, Alice and Ann Hogue. 2007. Introduction to Academic Writing Third Edition. New York: Pearson Education Inc. p. 15
Op. Cit. p. 61
Richard, Jack C. and Theodore S. Rodgers. 2001. Approaches and Method in Language Teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press., p. 21.
Sudijono, Anas. 2009. Pengantar Statistik Pendidikan. Jakarta. PT Rajawali Pers. p. 43
Sumarsono, Sigit. 2014. Metodologi Riset Pendidikan Bahasa. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo.
Tarigan, H. Guntur. 1990. Pengajaran Analysis Kesalahan Berbahasa. (Bandung:Angkasa). p. 68
Op. Cit. p.85-88
Ur, Penny. 1999. A Course in Language Teaching: Practice and Theory. London: Cambridge University, p. 70
citation:   Asmia, Devtika Ola dan Siswana, Siswana dan Zuhad, Ahmad  (2020) An Error Analysis on Descriptive Writing Made By The Tenth Grade Students’ of SMA Muhammadiyah 18 Jakarta in the Second Semester of 2019/2020 Academic Year.  Bachelor thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka.   
document_url: http://repository.uhamka.ac.id/id/eprint/14365/1/FKIP_PBI_1301065041_DEVTIKA%20OLA%20ASMIA.pdf