eprintid: 12519
rev_number: 7
eprint_status: archive
userid: 2953
dir: disk0/00/01/25/19
datestamp: 2022-01-24 14:57:53
lastmod: 2022-01-24 14:57:53
status_changed: 2022-01-24 14:57:53
type: conference_item
succeeds: 12216
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: Komara, Cahya
creators_id: cahya.komara@uhamka.ac.id
creators_orcid: 0000-0001-7994-8440
title: Students' View of Learning Management System (LMS) Used in Online English Learning Class during Covid-19 Pandemic Period
ispublished: pub
subjects: LB
subjects: PE
subjects: T1
divisions: 88203
abstract: This study investigates students' view of Learning Management System (LMS) used in their online English learning class around March to June 2020 as the consequence of Covid-19 pandemic outbreak occurred in Indonesia. As we know, the pandemic of covid-19 has forced students to learn from home by using LMS provided for them by their teachers or schools, such as Google Classroom, Schoology, Edmodo, Moodle, or any other platforms. Hence, this study is aimed to figure out whether or not the students viewed LMS as positive or negative to support and facilitate their online English learning during Covid-19 pandemic. There are 5 main aspects to ask in this research which are; 1) features and display, 2) system quality, 3) students’ perceived usefulness (likeness, motivation, activeness), 4) satisfaction, and 5) English competence. To achieve such goal, the online close-ended questionnaire was used and given to 428 students from three different levels of education (junior high school, senior high school, and university students) in Jakarta, Bogor, Depok, Tangerang, and Bekasi area who experienced in learning English with those LMS mentioned before. After the data was successfully gathered from the instrument, the researcher analyzed it quantitatively and interpreted it as one. The finding revealed that majority students selected strongly agree (SA) and agree (A) options on questionnaire which meant they viewed positively on LMS they used. In terms of Features and Display, most students viewed that their LMS had provided them with good or attractive (57.94 or X ̅ = 5.40) and easy to use (59.80 or X ̅ = 8.54) menu provided. Next, in terms of System Quality, most students viewed that their LMS works really well; good and stable (55.00 or X ̅ = 5.28). Then, in context of Perceived Usefulness, students viewed their English learning were effective and efficient, such as easy to access and understand materials or quickly to do task submission and quiz completion (57.10 or X ̅ = 8.03). Also, they liked learning English using LMS; it was fun, and they became active and motivated (57.20 or X ̅ = 11.14). Last, in terms of satisfaction, most students viewed that they got new experience. They wanted to study more with LMS, and they strongly recommended the use of LMS in English learning process (56.37 or X ̅ = 11.30). However, in the aspect of English competence, the majority of students selected on Neutral (N) option (49.00 or X ̅ = 5.00) that can be caused from several reasons or factors needed to be analyzed more in future.
date: 2021-03-01
date_type: published
official_url: https://ltte2020.weebly.com/
full_text_status: public
pres_type: paper
pagerange: 71-85
event_title: Language Teacher Training and Education International Conference
event_location: Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, West Java, Indonesia
event_dates: 22-25 September 2020
event_type: conference
refereed: TRUE
related_url_url: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351257074_Students'_View_of_Learning_Management_System_LMS_Used_in_Online_English_Learning_Class_During_Covid-19_Pandemic_Period
related_url_type: author
referencetext: Abdelraheem, A. Y. (2012). Interactions quality in moodle as perceived by learners and its relation with some variables. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 13(3), 375–389.

Amaro, S. Italy’s coronavirus death toll is more than double China’s —this might be why. CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/27/why-coronavirus-deaths-are-higher-in-italy-spain than -in-china.html. Published March 2, 2020. Accessed August 21, 2020. 

Ayan, E. (2015). Moodle as Builder of Motivation and Autonomy in English Courses. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 5(1), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2015.51002
Benach, J. (2020). We Must Take Advantage of This Pandemic to Make a Radical Social Change: The Coronavirus as a Global Health, Inequality, and Eco-Social Problem. International Journal of Health Services, 0(0), 1–5. 
Cabinet Secretariat of the Republic of Indonesia. Education minister to coordinate online education upon schools closures. https://setkab.go.id/en/education-minister-to-coordinate-online-education-upon-schools-closures/. Published March 16, 2020. Accessed August 25, 2020. 
Chaw, L. Y., & Tang, C. M. (2018). What Makes Learning Management Systems Effective for Learning ? Journal of Educationa Technology System, 0(0), 1–18. 
Chinyio, E., & Morton, N. (2006). The effectiveness of e-learning. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 2, 73–86.
Çobanoğlu, A. A. (2018). Student teachers’ satisfaction for blended learning via Edmodo learning management system. Behaviour and Information Technology, 37(2), 133–144. 
Conde, M. Á., García-Peñalvo, F. J., Rodríguez-Conde, M. J., Alier, M., Casany, M. J., & Piguillem, J. (2014). An evolving Learning Management System for new educational environments using 2.0 tools. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(2), 188–204. 
Dabbagh, N., & Bannan-Ritland, B. (2005). Online learning: Concepts, strategies, and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Damnjanovic, V., Jednak, S., & Mijatovic, I. (2015). Factors affecting the effectiveness and use of Moodle: students’ perception. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(4), 496–514. 
Dias, S. B., Diniz, J. A., & Hadjileontiadis, L. J. (2014). Towards an Intelligent Learning Management System Under Blended Learning. New York: Springer.
EasyLMS. History of LMS. https://www.easy-lms.com/knowledge-center/lms-knowledge-center/history-of-lms/item10401. Accessed August 26, 2020. 
Elearning Industry. Top LMS Softwares. https://elearningindustry.com/directory/software-categories/learning-management-systems. Accessed August 26, 2020. 
El-Seoud, S. M., Taj-Eddin, I. A. T. F., Seddiek, N., El-Khouly, M. M., & Nosseir, A. (2014). E-learning and students’ motivation: A research study on the effect of e-learning on higher education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 9(4), 20–26. 
Feizabadi, N., Aliabadi, K., & Ahmadabadi, M. (2016). The impact of English learning software Moodle. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies (IJHCS) ISSN 2356-5926, 1(1), 1427–1437.
Gedera, D. S. P. (2014). Students’ experiences of learning in a virtual classroom. International Journal of Education & Development Using Information & Communication Technology, 10(4), 93–101. 
Jurado, R. G., Petterson, T., Gomez, A. R., & Scheja, M. (2013). Classification of the Features in Learning Management Systems. In XVII Scientific Convention on Engineering and Architecture, Havana City, Cuba, Nov 24th-28. XVII Scientific Convention on Engineering and Architecture, 53(9), 1689–1699. 
Kats, Y. (2010). Learning management system technologies and software solutions for online teaching: Tools and applications. In Learning Management System Technologies and Software Solutions for Online Teaching: Tools and Applications. 
Kraleva, R., Sabani, M., & Kralev, V. (2019). An analysis of some learning management systems. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 9(4), 1190–1198. 
Lee, B. C., Yoon, J. O., & Lee, I. (2009). Learners’ acceptance of e-learning in South Korea: Theories and results. Computers and Education, 53(4), 1320–1329. 
Liaw, S. (2008). Investigating students ’ perceived satisfaction , behavioral intention , and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system. Computers and Education, 51, 864–873. 
Liaw, S. S., Huang, H. M., & Chen, G. D. (2007). Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning. Computers and Education, 49(4), 1066–1080. 
Muthiariny, D. E. Indonesia ranks 23rd in the world for COVID-19 cases. Tempo. https://en.tempo.co/read/1378772/indonesia-ranks-23rd-in-the-world-for-covid-19-cases. Published August 24, 2020. Accessed August 25, 2020. 
Metler, C. A. (2015). Introduction to educational research. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Mtbe, J. S. (2015). Learning Management System success : Increasing Learning Management System usage in higher education in sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information Communication Technology, 11(2), 51–64.
Ohliati, J., & Abbas, B. S. (2019). Measuring students satisfaction in using learning management system. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(4), 180–189. 
Pérez-Pérez, M., Serrano-Bedia, A. M., & García-Piqueres, G. (2019). An analysis of factors affecting students´ perceptions of learning outcomes with Moodle. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 00(00), 1–16. 
Ponto, J. (2015). Understanding and Evaluating Survey Research. Journal of the Advanced Practitioner in Oncology, 6(2), 168–16871.
Rattcliffe, R. First coronavirus cases confirmed in Indonesia amid fears nation is ill-prepared for outbreak. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/02/first-coronavirus-cases-confirmed-in-indonesia-amid-fears-nation-is-ill-prepared-for-outbreak. Published March 2, 2020. Accessed August 21, 2020. 
Ren, X. (2020). Pandemic and lockdown : a territorial approach to COVID-19 in China, Italy and the United States. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 00(00), 1–12. 
Riad, A. M., El-Minir, H. K., & El-Ghareeb. (2009). Evaluation of utilizing service oriented architecture as a suitable solution to align university management information systems and learning management SYSTEMS. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 10(4r), 27–40.
Sánchez, R. A., & Hueros, A. D. (2010). Motivational factors that influence the acceptance of Moodle using TAM. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1632–1640. 
Santiago, B. J., Ramírez, J. M. O., Rodríguez-Reséndiz, J., Dector, A., García, R. G., González-Durán, J. E. E., & Sánchez, F. F. (2020). Learning management system-based evaluation to determine academic efficiency performance. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(10), 1–17. 
Tay, L. Y., Lim, C. P., Lye, S. Y., Ng, K. J., & Lim, S. K. (2011). Open-source learning management system and Web 2 . 0 online social software applications as learning platforms for an elementary school in Singapore. Learning, Media, and Technology, 36(4), 349–365.
Turnbull, D., Chugh, R., & Luck, J. (2020). Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies. Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies, (August), 0–7. 
Tziallas, G., Kontogeorgos, A., & Papanastasiou, C. (2016). An E-Learning Platform for Departmental Use. Creative Education, 07(09), 1189–1194. 
Wihastyanang, W. D., Hentasmaka, D., & Anjarwati, R. (2014). Active Learning Using Learning Management System To Improve Students ’ Competence. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 4(1), 1–4.
Yildirim, S., Temur, N., Kocaman, A., & Göktaş, Y. (2004). What makes a good LMS: An analytical approach to assessment of LMSs. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training, ITHET 2004, 125–130.
Yuen, A. H. K., Cheng, M., & Chan, F. H. F. (2019). Student satisfaction with learning management systems: A growth model of belief and use. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2520–2535. 
World Health Organization. Coronavirus (covid-19) disease. https://www.who.int/emergencies/ diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019. Published August 10, 2020 (last update). Accessed August 16, 2020.
citation:   Komara, Cahya  (2021) Students' View of Learning Management System (LMS) Used in Online English Learning Class during Covid-19 Pandemic Period.  In: Language Teacher Training and Education International Conference, 22-25 September 2020, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, West Java, Indonesia.     
document_url: http://repository.uhamka.ac.id/id/eprint/12519/1/Artikel%20Prosiding%20LTTE%202021.pdf