eprintid: 12417
rev_number: 7
eprint_status: archive
userid: 2133
dir: disk0/00/01/24/17
datestamp: 2022-01-05 07:46:28
lastmod: 2022-01-05 07:46:28
status_changed: 2022-01-05 07:46:28
type: article
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: Tiarsiwi, Fidaniar
creators_id: shewe87@uhamka.ac.id
creators_orcid: 0000-0003-2496-9716
title: THE USE OF LEARNERS’DIARIES: DOES IT WORK TO ENGAGE STUDENTS’METACOGNITION IN LEARNING IF CLAUSES?
ispublished: pub
subjects: L
subjects: PE
divisions: 88203
abstract: Metacognitive strategies are expected as ‘higher order executive skills’ which enable college students to approach learning systematically and effectively by using the elements of planning, monitoring and evaluating. This study is conducted to investigate whether or not metacognitive strategies can affect the development of structural knowledge of students. To reflect how the students use these strategies, learning diary can lead the learners to strategy use. Twenty-one participants of third semester students were involved. Nine of them were selected to be probed intensively for their metacognitive habits in learning If Clauses. Then, they were divided into three groups according to the level of students’ progress and their mid test score. The first group was assumed as novice learners, the second group was categorized as medium level students and the last group was presumed as expert learners. This study revealed that expert learners were better diarist in documenting what they did when learning. The medium level students also indicated that their capability in realizing the use of their cognition was up and down. They were good at evaluating their shortcoming and monitoring some progress, but they were poor at planning and modifying strategies. Meanwhile, the novice learners less reflected how they learned on their documentation. It could be illustrated that they did not have any motivation to plan their learning, evaluate and monitor their learning.
date: 2021-10-30
date_type: published
publisher: Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Uhamka
official_url: https://journal.uhamka.ac.id/index.php/ellter-j
id_number: 10.22236/ellter.v2i2.7684
full_text_status: public
publication: ELLTER Journal
volume: 2
number: 2
pagerange: 26-35
refereed: TRUE
issn: 2746-1424
related_url_url: https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=Q-OpDI4AAAAJ&alert_preview_top_rm=2&citation_for_view=Q-OpDI4AAAAJ:UeHWp8X0CEIC
related_url_type: author
referencetext: Allwright, D., & Bailey K.M. (1991). Focus on the Language Classroom: An Introduction to
Classroom Research for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burns, N., & S.K Grove. (2001). The Practice of Nursing Research (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA:
W.B. Saunders Company.
Chamot, A. U., & J. M. O' Malley. (1994). The CALLA handbook: Implementing the Cognitive
Academic Language.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, And Evaluating
Quantitative And Qualitative Research (4th ed). Boston: Pearson
DeCapua, A. (2008). Grammar for Teachers (A Guide to American English for Native and NonNative Speakers), Springer. New York.
Ericsson, K. Anders; Simon, Herbert A. (1996). Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data (3rd
ed.).MA: MIT Press.
Greenbaum, S., & Gerald N. (2002). An Introduction to English Grammar (second edition).
Edinburgh: Pearson Education
Hauck, M. (2005). Metacognitive knowledge, metacognitive strategies and CALL. In J. Egbert
and G. Petrie (eds.), CALL research perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
Harris, Vee et al. (1998). Helping Learners Learn: exploring strategy instruction in language
classrooms across Europe. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
Huegli, Vicki-Ann. Strategies for Grammar. (QLWG Skills for Life). Quebec: Quebec Literacy
Working Group.
Hurd, S., & Tim, L. (2008). Language Learning Strategies In Independent Settings. Bristol:
Multilingual Matters.
Jackson, H. (2005). Good Grammar for Students. London: Sage Publications.
Jepsen, Leif Obel, , L. Mathiassen & P. A. Nielsen. 1989. Back to Thinking Mode - Diaries as a
Medium for Effective Management of Information Systems Development. In: Behaviour
and Information Technology, Vol. 8, No. 3
JNJ. 2012. The Relationship between Students’ Achievement in Vocabulary and Reading Ability
at First Grade in SMPN 1 West Cikarang . UHAMKA
Kroeger, P. R. (2005). Analyzing Grammar (An introduction). Cambridge University Press:
New York.
Lester, M. (2008). ESL Grammar (A handbook for Intermediate and Advanced ESL Students)
MacGraw Hill: New York.
Mercer, Sarah et al. (2012). Psychology for Language Learning (Insight from Research and
Theory and Practice). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Murray, G. (1999). Autonomy and language learning in a simulated environment. System,
Volume, 295-308.
O’Malley, J. D. & Anna Uhl Chamot. (1990). Learning Strategies in Second Language
Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oxford, R. L. (1996). Language Learning Motivation: Pathways to New Century. Hawaii:
University of Hawaii Press.
Oxford, R. L. (1996). Language Learning Strategies around the World: Cross-Cultural
Perspectives, University of Hawaii Press Second Language Teaching and Curriculum
Center: Oxford Honolulu.
Moore, A. (1999). http://www.universalteacher.org.uk/lang/engstruct.html.
Nakatani, Yasuo (2005). The effects of awareness-raising instruction on oral communication
strategy use. The Modern Language Journal, 89, 76–91.
Nordquist, Richard http://grammar.about.com/od/basicsentencegrammar/a/grammarintro.html.
Parahoo, K. 1997. Nursing Research: Principles, Process and Issues. Palgrave Macmillan,
Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK.
Pemberton, R. (2001). http://lc.ust.hk/~sac/advice/english/grammar/G2.html
Polit, D. F., & B. P, Hungler. (1999). Nursing Research: Principles and Methods 6th Edition.
Philadelphia: Lippincott.
Purpura, E. James. 2004. Assessing Grammar. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Radford, Andrew. 2009. Analysing English Sentences (A Minimalist Approach). Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press:
Roszandi, D. (2012). http://www.tempo.co/read/news/2012/08/05/079421508/KemampuanGuru-Bahasa-Inggris-SMP-Memprihatinkan
Rubin, J. (2005). The expert language learner: a review of good language learner studies and
learner strategies. In Keith Johnson. (ed.), Expertise in second language learning and
teaching, (pp. 37–64). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Suzanne, A., & Lilika, C. (2011). http://www.linguaglobe.com/en/projects/357/2011.
Thornbury, Scott. 1999. How to Teach Grammar. London: Longman.
Van Dijk, T. A., & W. Kintsch. (1983). Strategies for Discourse Comprehension. Orlando, FL:
Academic Press.
Webster, M. Online Dictionary http://www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/metacognition.
Williams, M., & R. L. Burden. (1997). Psychology for Language Teachers. New York:
Cambridge University Press.
Woodfield, H., & Elisabeth L. (1998). Diaries: a reflective tool on an INSET language course.
ELT Journal 52(4), 315-321.
Zhao, Huahui. (2011). Using Learners’ Diaries to Investigate the Influence of Students’ English
Language Proficiency on Peer Assessment. Journal of Academic Writing, 1(1).
citation:   Tiarsiwi, Fidaniar  (2021) THE USE OF LEARNERS’DIARIES: DOES IT WORK TO ENGAGE STUDENTS’METACOGNITION IN LEARNING IF CLAUSES?  ELLTER Journal, 2 (2).  pp. 26-35.  ISSN 2746-1424     
document_url: http://repository.uhamka.ac.id/id/eprint/12417/1/7684-Article%20Text-21982-2-10-20211030.pdf