Framing Pemberitaan Media Online mengenai Bentrokan antara Anggota Front Pembela Islam (FPI) dan Anggota Kepolisian

Said Romadlan, Dini Wahdiyati

Abstract


Basically a news story must be objective, balanced, and unbiased. But in practice there is often a news story that is not objective, unbalanced, and biased. This is because there are interests that influence the pattern of media content so that the news tends to be biased. One form of media bias is framing, which is selecting certain issues and removing other issues, and highlighting certain facts and covering up other facts. With regard to framing practices, this article focuses on two issues, firstly, how to frame the news of clashes between members of the Islamic Defenders Front (FPI) and police members in the online media Kompas.com and Tirto.id? Second, what are the factors that influence the framing of the news of clashes between members of the Islamic Defenders Front (FPI) and members of the police in the online media Kompas.com and Tirto.id? To understand the framing of the two online media, used framing analysis model Robert Entman as research method. Data collection uses documentation in the form of news of clashes between FPI members and police in Kompas.com and Tirto.id. While the data analysis is text analysis and context analysis. The results of the study showed first, framing Kompas.com further highlight the fact of the attacks carried out by FPI members against members of the Police that resulted in 6 FPI members being shot dead. While framing the Tirto.id further highlights the fact of the shootings committed by police members against FPI members that led to the deaths of 6 FPI members. Second, the factor that influences framing is the practice of organizations (media routines) of both online media. Thus, the both of online media in their coverage of clashes between FPI members and police members tend to be biased because it is influenced by their respective of media practices.


Full Text:

PDF (Indonesian)

References


Ananda, M. F. S., Nugraha, A. R., & Sumartias, S. (2019). Analisis framing pemberitaan korupsi massal di media online detik.com. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi (Indonesian Journal of Communications Studies), 3(2), 253. https://doi.org/10.25139/jsk.v3i2.1464

Anggoro, A. D. (2014). Media, Politik dan Kekuasaan. Jurnal Aristo, 2(2), 25–52.

Anggraeni, D. (2018). Entman Framing Analysis of Food Governance in Online Media. Jurnal The Messenger, 10(1), 113. https://doi.org/10.26623/themessenger.v10i1.711

Aniatsari, I., Muhaemin, E., & Eif Saiful Amin Dang. (2018). Pemberitaan Konflik FPI dan GMBI pada Pikiran Rakyat, Republika dan Tribun Jabar. 3, 46–66. https://jurnal.fdk.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/jurnalistik

Arbi, I. A. (2020, December 7). Kronologi Tewasnya 6 Orang Pendukung Rizieq Shihab, Polisi Sempat Dipepet dan Diserang. Kompas.Com. https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2020/12/07/14052611/kronologi-tewasnya-6-orang-pendukung-rizieq-shihab-polisi-sempat-dipepet.

Ariestyani, K. (2020). Travel Journalism: News Framing Policy of Five Super-Priority Tourism Destinations in the Contemporary Online News Media. 459(Jcc), 143–146. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200818.033

Briantika, A. (2020a, December 7). Baku Tembak Pengikut Rizieq Shihab & Polisi, 6 Orang Tewas. Tirto.Id. https://tirto.id/f7QZ

Briantika, A. (2020b, December 7). Laskar FPI Ditembak, Polri Sebut Tak Persulit Keluarga Urus Jenazah. Tirto.Id. https://tirto.id/f7RY

Briantika, A. (2020c, December 8). Di Mana Rizieq Shihab Saat Polisi Tembak Mati Laskar FPI? Tirto.Id. https://tirto.id/f7Sk

Briantika, A. (2020d, December 9). Berbagai Kejanggalan Kasus Laskar FPI Pengawal Rizieq Vs Polisi. Tirto.Id. https://tirto.id/f7Us

Bustomi, M. I. (2020a, December 7). 10 Pengikut Rizieq Serang Polisi, 6 Orang Ditembak Mati dan 4 Orang Melarikan Diri. Kompas.Com. https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2020/12/07/14015371/10-pengikut-rizieq-serang-polisi-6-orang-ditembak-mati-dan-4-orang.

Bustomi, M. I. (2020b, December 7). Polisi Sita Pedang hingga Senjata Api Kasus Penyerangan Laskar Khusus FPI. Kompas.Com. https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2020/12/07/16564921/polisi-sita-pedang-hingga-senjata-api-kasus-penyerangan-laskar-khusus-fpi?page=all.

Bustomi, M. I. (2020c, December 7). Serang Polisi, 6 Orang Simpatisan Rizieq Shihab Tewas Ditembak di Tol. Kompas.Com. https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2020/12/07/13325341/serang-polisi-6-orang-simpatisan-rizieq-shihab-tewas-ditembak-di-tol?page=all.

Bustomi, M. I. (2020d, December 8). Fakta-fakta 6 Simpatisan Rizieq Shihab Tewas Ditembak: Serang Polisi hingga Bantahan FPI. Kompas.Com. https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2020/12/08/08041811/fakta-fakta-6-simpatisan-rizieq-shihab-tewas-ditembak-serang-polisi?page=3.

Ciptadi, S. G., & Armando, A. (2018). Upaya Agensi Melawan Logika Jangka Pendek Jurnalisme Daring: Studi Kasus Tirto.id. Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.7454/jki.v7i1.9690

Danisworo, J. H. (2014). Konstruksi realitas dalam peristiwa kekerasan antara anggota fpi dengan warga di kabupaten kendal di surat kabar kompas dan republika (kajian analisis framing robert m. entman pada surat kabar kompas dan republika edisi 20 juli-26 juli 2013). Universitas Multimedia Nusantara.

Desvianny, N. F., & Susanto, E. H. (2020). Pelanggaran Kode Etik Jurnalistik dalam Pemberitaan Anak di GTV. Koneksi, 4(2), 318. https://doi.org/10.24912/kn.v4i2.8154

DewanPers. (2008). Peraturan Dewan Pers Nomor: 6/Peraturan-DP/V/2008 Tentang Pengesahan Surat Keputusan Dewan Pers Nomor 03/SK-DP/III/2006 tentang Kode Etik Jurnalistik.

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

Entman, R. M. (2007). Framing bias: Media in the distribution of power. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00336.x

Eriyanto. (2002). Analisis Framing: Konstruksi, Ideologi, dan Politik Media. Yogyakarta: LKiS.

Gaio, A. M. S. M. C. D. (2015). Analisis Framing Robert Entman Pada Pemberitaan Konflik KPK Vs POLRI di Vivanews.co.id dan Detiknews.com. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, Vol. 4, No(3), 451–455.

Halim, D. (2020, December 10). Usut Bentrok dengan FPI, Polisi Buka Hotline. Kompas.Com. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2020/12/10/17531841/usut-bentrok-dengan-fpi-polisi-buka-hotline?page=all.

Haq, A. D., & Fadilah, E. (2019). Transformasi Harian Kompas Menjadi Portal Berita Digital Subscription Kompas.Id. Jurnal Kajian Jurnalisme, 1(2), 190–213. https://doi.org/10.24198/jkj.v1i2.21339

Ihsanuddin. (2020). FPI Klaim Diserang Lebih Dulu, 6 Pengawal Rizieq Diculik. Kompas.Com. https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2020/12/07/14292891/fpi-klaim-diserang-lebih-dulu-6-pengawal-rizieq-diculik?page=all.

Kriyantono, R. (2009). Teknik Praktis Riset komunikasi. Jakarta: Prenada Media.

Latief, R. (2018). Penerapan Jurnalisme Presisi Dalam Pemilihan Kepala Daerah (Pilkada). Jurnalisa, 04(1), 46–60.

McQuail, D. (2010). Mass Communication Theory (6th ed.). London: Sage Publication.

Ningsih, S., Zubair, A., & Gusfa, H. (2019). Indonesian Women Politicians Based on a Newspaper’s Perception. 343, 480–486. https://doi.org/10.2991/icas-19.2019.99

Nur, M. J. (2018). NEW DIFFERENTIATION OF CONTENT AND ONLINE MEDIA AUDIENCE IN INDONESIA: A STUDY ON TIRTO.ID. International Journal of Communication and Media Studies (IJCMS), 8(1), 19–26.

Pinontoan, N. A., & Wahid, U. (2020). Analisis Framing Pemberitaan Banjir Jakarta Januari 2020 Di Harian Kompas.Com Dan Jawapos.Com. Komuniti : Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Teknologi Informasi, 12(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.23917/komuniti.v12i1.9928

Prasetyanti, D. E. (2018). Manajemen Redaksi Media Online Tirto.id Dalam Upaya Mewujudkan Jurnalisme Data. Universitas Islam Indonesia.

Rohimah, I. (2018). Etika dan Kode Etik Jurnalistik dalam Media Online Islam. KOMUNIKA: Jurnal Dakwah Dan Komunikasi, 11(2), 213–234. https://doi.org/10.24090/komunika.v11i2.1054

Setiawan, R. (2020, December 8). Muhammadiyah Desak Jokowi Buat Tim Independen Penembakan Laskar FPI. Tirto.Id. https://tirto.id/f7TT

Shah, D. V., McLoad, D. M., Gotlieb, M. R., & Lee, N. (2009). Framing and Agenda Setting. In R. L. Nabi & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Media Processes and Effects (pp. 83–98). London: Sage Publication.

Shoemaker, P. J., Eichholz, M., Kim, E., & Wrigley, B. (2001). Individual and Routine Forces in Gatekeeping. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(2), 233–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900107800202

Shoemaker, P. J., & Reese, S. D. (1996). Mediating the Message Theories of Influences on Mass Media Content (2nd ed.). New York: Longman Publisher.

Sigal, L. V. (1973). Reporters and Officials: The Organization dan Politics of Newsmaking. Massachussets: DC Heath and Company.

Susanto, E. H., & Zhang, S. D. (2017). Critical Discourse Analysis of Interfaith Marriage News from Cyber Media in Indonesia. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 7(1), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2017.v7n1p91

Taher, A. P. (2020a, December 7). 6 Orang yang Ditembak Mati Polisi Laskar FPI Pengawal Rizieq Shihab. Tirto.Id. https://tirto.id/f7Q4

Taher, A. P. (2020b, December 7). FPI Bantah Laskar FPI Pengawal Rizieq Dilengkapi Senjata Api. Tirto.Id. https://tirto.id/f7RL

Zahra, R. R., & Sobur, A. (2019). Implementasi Jurnalisme Presisi dalam Produksi Berita di Media Online [Universitas Islam Bandung]. http://repository.unisba.ac.id/handle/123456789/23384




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30596%2Finteraksi.v6i2.10135

Jurnal Interaksi : Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Indexed By:




 Jurnal Interaksi : Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi

The Communication Studies, Faculty of Social and Political Science ( C Building), University of Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara, Jalan Kapten Mukhtar Basri No. 3 Medan 20238

Contact Person : Akhyar Anshori 0822 7700 0285 (WA),

e-mail : jurnalinteraksi@umsu.ac.id   Web: http://jurnal.umsu.ac.id/index.php/interaksi

Publisher: Umsu Press http://umsupress.umsu.ac.id


 Jurnal Interaksi : Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi in Collaboration With:

           

 

 

Lisensi Creative Commons
Jurnal Interaksi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi is licensed under Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.